IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal

"Christopher LILJENSTOLPE" <cdl_forward@cdl.asgaard.org> Thu, 26 March 2015 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <cdl_forward@cdl.asgaard.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB1C1A03F9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iUZ6gZbXrXUR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp5.emailarray.com (smtp5.emailarray.com [65.39.216.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 469F81A03A2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8754 invoked by uid 89); 26 Mar 2015 22:30:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.24.10.65?) (Y2RsQGFzZ2FhcmQub3JnQDE5OC4xNDcuMjI2LjY=) (POLARISLOCAL) by smtp5.emailarray.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 26 Mar 2015 22:30:11 -0000
From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl_forward@cdl.asgaard.org>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:30:09 -0700
Message-ID: <7759CF64-14D6-43FC-B6AC-4D44931BFEEF@cdl.asgaard.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2egob4yst.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <5513FE6B.7090405@dcrocker.net> <651803AE-97A4-4297-A079-B94A6BD1F104@nominum.com> <m2egob4yst.wl%randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9r5078)
X-PolarisMail-Flags: x
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MErdD3hcPtXNuWPACYSpndTP1k8>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:24:28 -0700
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:30:15 -0000

On 26 Mar 2015, at 7:29, Randy Bush wrote:

>>> So I suggest that providing explicit feedback to all appointees not 
>>> up
>>> for renewal become a regular part of nomcom's deliverables.
>> I think this would be a fine plan.
>
> great idea.  nomcom needs stuff to fill its copious spare time.
>
> randy

I have to agree with Randy here.  I've done the nomcom job before, and I 
have to say, I was not sitting around looking for things to fill my time 
up with.  I seem to remember many "hair on fire" days/nights trying to 
close everything up by the appointed date.  I don't discount the value 
of the feedback, but I don't think adding it to the nomcom's plate is 
necessarily the most optimal solution.

Christopher


--
李柯睿
Avt tace, avt loqvere meliora silentio
Check my PGP key here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.asc
Current vCard here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.vcf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email