IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTBF, was IETF subpoena processes update and a request

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Sat, 25 March 2017 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73101293F2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qRxY5wzT8txI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C257128AB0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.28] (cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com [172.250.240.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2P39NOw003925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: RTBF, was IETF subpoena processes update and a request
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14D27)
In-Reply-To: <20170325011825.85855.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:09:23 -0700
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1DB553AB-CFE3-4537-BEDF-2E4FDAF24895@isi.edu>
References: <20170325011825.85855.qmail@ary.lan>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MHZwtWbO5JMcILHavGP_nZctkRU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 03:09:42 -0000


> On Mar 24, 2017, at 6:18 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> In article <a5e9202a-1c2e-e7c5-989d-745c7fbeaefb@isi.edu> you write:
>> This seems like it also raises the EU's "right to be forgotten"
>> principle, which would affect whether the ISOC can archive even notices
>> that were originally public.
> 
> Only if ISOC were subject to EU law.  Since ISOC has no physical
> presence in the EU and the IETF has no office anywhere, I don't see
> why EU law would apply.

I was wondering more if it would matter if the subpoena were issued by the EU or referred to a party who were an EU citizen. 

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email