IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAEF1292C5; Mon, 8 May 2017 03:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OYLgCNoxX8YH; Mon, 8 May 2017 03:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x244.google.com (mail-wr0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E6A4126FB3; Mon, 8 May 2017 03:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x244.google.com with SMTP id g12so7710991wrg.2; Mon, 08 May 2017 03:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=otNqVbd/gv619R2if1cwTHsQmKj5wW3dKdwjbrU36NI=; b=BtrP+lFrfAtLE1aW7ms1huOJ7iLQEUSg9AfrjOvx+3nPT05RA/F8VvPngnrSpYsSjs JhTaHklQZm1YNmBdWq5dJssZ9Aoz/QYfclkSKg/zMXqlj7drPZ3Ko0k4LN4u2RykFr0b R/rlHD81GvHi3at5m89s2roKN6dEXkESpFD/KFuLLwOfM9YprALep8c4IXnrhUV5uLHu sI4OQy6dUSxdo9+0wNosBLAitQ3FsPmvSQFCAteAoqev8lXCd9icdeTSq6dlaHpYGsTD 6nemctLd5AwcSxeO5IUe9ycLoCBujIyNufiYes5YQ2MdnqM/bTvqIj1tpUpKjtjoVPGZ 4jPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=otNqVbd/gv619R2if1cwTHsQmKj5wW3dKdwjbrU36NI=; b=NqAfu8ZiXMt3wdJec/L+/K2O3mg0CZdT1EG4Fe3/TREogCLTQcUc+LVxhcldgf8CuG /WhunyPRRNkumYpHzRPKsNr7mLQ7XKZWvtX1u6Rb0JfoA1uBrwD+bkZM/LPcUbhRvE4i LZr+1isB08TR6eGu4shcDjJUDploTOjyHD+i8nTB/agVspJnQ+8oQ7AWtenMzapmtge+ jFkQP1uwLxgYh3zJESJPbkH8L5moy0g0FJHbKsE/R0bDXkUlV3vbaay6w6uNJHnyNeHl 7boSp3C9Ym+bN++ifgm9tScgQzs0vV2+tb6xFunZlUBl/gMvPWFvv2d9cwobOwqpYwmY 62Jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4XtdzP3z/DqH8+tA8IqXlYBTUQ2bTbiPCEVHHtGhRW5eq96oY1 1H1nhhXbF97s3XCMnFz8Iw==
X-Received: by 10.223.147.97 with SMTP id 88mr36914030wro.134.1494238561473; Mon, 08 May 2017 03:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j133sm9679706wmg.26.2017.05.08.03.16.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 May 2017 03:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, stefano previdi <sprevidi@cisco.com>
References: <149374426742.21414.16408814015665498739@ietfa.amsl.com> <3E209B45-90CE-4EEB-9D2B-E14EFE28DCE0@cisco.com> <87a1534f-079d-3707-9f5d-9327e831bf7a@gmail.com> <B91C6D2C-897A-404C-80B3-EAA8BDEC4414@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERnsEn3JBpb8b7Jwcm32K=-iGA3GOPokWwnaXqSpDW89Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases.all@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <28cabccc-5426-9938-e2bf-169de0959ddc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 11:15:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERnsEn3JBpb8b7Jwcm32K=-iGA3GOPokWwnaXqSpDW89Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MJziiWBMMqICtkKM0xDHzSTB0ks>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 10:16:05 -0000


On 05/05/2017 11:17, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> And to add one observation ..
>
> Stewart makes a point that SR-MPLS can be deployed without mpls 
> control plane.
>
> Well it sure does not require LDP however IGP or BGP extensions for 
> SR-MPLS signalling is also an example of mpls control plane ... even 
> if much simpler than traditional cases it is still required.

Yes, but those are required anyway to support SRv6. You always have to 
provide the mapping between the function, the function identifier and 
the function location.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email