Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU> Tue, 08 July 2008 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B3C28C363; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE873A683A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQAWgW24kRjK for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBB23A677E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zod.isi.edu (zod.isi.edu [128.9.168.221]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m68LZ0W1028846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from faber@localhost) by zod.isi.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m68LYxex002894; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:34:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from faber)
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:34:59 -0700
From: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Message-ID: <20080708213459.GD92049@zod.isi.edu>
References: <20080707211347.GB2222@zod.isi.edu> <200807080018.m680IPi1016117@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20080708013242.GB10677@zod.isi.edu> <4872DEC5.9040707@network-heretics.com> <20080708172708.GC2519@zod.isi.edu> <4873AF55.8060803@network-heretics.com> <20080708204142.GB92049@zod.isi.edu> <4873D807.7030701@network-heretics.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4873D807.7030701@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-url: http://www.isi.edu/~faber
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: faber@zod.isi.edu
Cc: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0344202750=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:11:35PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> And vanity TLDs are going to be much more attractive if people think 
> they can get single-label host names out of them.

Of your concerns (which I don't have the relevant experience to comment
on in detail), this seems to be fairly small and speculative to me.

Time will tell.

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf