Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 21 October 2021 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F38D3A0A8D; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HlEyn-sjBryy; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 531FA3A0A88; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19LHCpG5016894; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:23:12 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=3Wrfhp3KwHTL7Ghv6uKO34Gox6r00bcwJif8nL17gew=; b=Dv94OtnoSfIw5D5f6js2+av4/uypf8Ek+tYfn7SvuUcAF819PVcvPwQSizr55MGtNtVj sfhOm91KEIloGrcitOORGdb2vyVdyqvV31Auy2QRMsqhsPcSgdIBQCpUpiP8/jlUgJuS gxQf7Kdx7++W8miPpAcTy+VXUH41lwUsRL9PrtaIB2J0zp03VxUIXUZwcqem9MY8Z7d/ IEwHe8s3dpmJ7mTMwizlawQN4a2JFPvb0yaIB09hs6sso0bqkLoH4PKiLlVFIbOlwjPo mghyhE9sysqi/H8BpGYKVCnLJ4/xKYQGxYa6G2q7vu95bueVm6KA7H7n84+tHdEVJzeo oA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 3bu9pe7jxx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:23:12 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19LKJboV022184; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:23:10 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3bsxhrcekf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:23:10 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:23:09 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.023; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:23:09 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba=40computer.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
Thread-Topic: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
Thread-Index: AQHXxddAKjIdH+LOF0mnbpXJbOhEqavcjNMA///ZkgCAAFLzgIABD1eAgABfEID//799gA==
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:23:09 +0000
Message-ID: <AC161376-4D0D-4B6B-90FB-A57C14C3E2E4@akamai.com>
References: <4BDF1DD9-9D30-499F-8C26-1E7790F2A729@akamai.com> <CALaySJKYG8ydGrgdSKZY1b28VL2DvwTS_3_40y_eFkHcGjdJXg@mail.gmail.com> <53A1649E-0E10-449D-9EC0-87A6FDCD07B2@gmail.com> <11EDEA4E-4301-4CB3-9529-6E4DF368789C@akamai.com> <67d01e27-8a1b-0ad8-afe0-4e9d4d8bb4d1@comcast.net> <F69E3F89-C44D-4692-8115-3B73477EEF54@akamai.com> <CAC4RtVDZ2tXmstcC1oh5NZ8u_FZ-WAVwH-M7nvh_inWTLnkbMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDZ2tXmstcC1oh5NZ8u_FZ-WAVwH-M7nvh_inWTLnkbMg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.54.21101001
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B479EA83146B62428F3AEECB3270D7ED@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-21_05:2021-10-21, 2021-10-21 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=849 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110210104
X-Proofpoint-GUID: wy02kML58bfQjZ9On1ZgwSU6Mjh86tBo
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: wy02kML58bfQjZ9On1ZgwSU6Mjh86tBo
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-21_05,2021-10-21_02,2020-04-07_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=800 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110210104
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MbxZysWg9M8As4eAXrYgrbC_Vjk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 20:23:21 -0000

>   I have made an alternative proposal, and I'd appreciate comments on
    that.  I think we can discuss both proposals together.

The third paragraph of section 2 ("A complication often arises...") is to me the point that makes this draft not viable.  Unless people are prohibited from being nominated, there's nothing to make change happen. Based on public comments so far, more people agree with you than me.

I agree that both proposals should be discussed and dispatched together. And perhaps JCK/Spencer if it happens.  Poised22 anyone?  Can we backcronym catch somehow?