IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com

Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> Sat, 26 October 2013 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rogerj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8773211E8296 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 00:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.282
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.282 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7pHEjzVMFB75 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 00:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EE211E8295 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 00:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hn9so2036284wib.17 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 00:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CstYXhkyZpHpN4Trd7XH0UUYpU7NgnMZZfWMvKpUhfk=; b=Spk2KwXtX48wZR2216J81QIJ5xB7h8+uT46GzrBhnAgCH8BWzGDmOR7oERIcnENOja 8FswDtXayKMzewswTIL4hiooqIv/A70W/QkKLb7MOiieuzXHcFO0q8Xud6JtLlPIy9zP pbPhAiIM1csP9KSrLGd3RnSsMw+cFhcxHdSva2VqxlE+0H4kQgKfDxJJ5f8yXQHyBgr1 KxcQfRszYrfR7bHUqIcTMtoYoyjD1oGJSTqVCT7NBsgTf2v6tcKv/R54zhZBVpiA6WJk k9uNSP6DF1qG8IOiN9tWSwqtispWWu8ADZcTBLCxsZ4/lEh7MMWbNi6u1Uu3NslPJIsv GQpg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.94.101 with SMTP id db5mr505322wjb.67.1382774262406; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 00:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.213.72 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 00:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20131026024004.3506.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <01OZZW7T12OY00004R@mauve.mrochek.com> <20131026024004.3506.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 09:57:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SEv+g1hL-TS5OpR-i+H3ednHX=TE4tQHyvxd0WtzPOr6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
From: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 07:58:08 -0000

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:40 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
<snip>
> In this particular case, the execution was clumsy, but the action was
> entirely appropriate.  We saw messages that were utterly irrelevant,
> from an address that had never sent anything else, in a style that
> strongly suggested it was a sock for a chronic troublemaker.  Why
> should we put up with that kind of nonsense?

+1 to that.

I've keept quiet in this case because it was such an obvious case of
troublemaker that showed up.

Can we let it go and move on since it seems like we actual agree but
just need something to discuss?


-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj@gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger@jorgensen.no

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email