Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)]
"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org> Fri, 16 September 2005 16:39 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EGJFb-0006o7-LR; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:39:47 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EGJFa-0006n6-HP for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:39:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA28070 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:39:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net ([204.127.202.59]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGJKc-00039R-Dh for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:44:59 -0400
Received: from s73602 (unknown[65.104.224.98]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with SMTP id <2005091616392901400j2ri3e>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:39:30 +0000
Message-ID: <035c01c5badd$2fe62d80$75087c0a@china.huawei.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0C885E7E@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:39:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
> Generally, the existence of an assignment authority does encourage > its (proper) use - mostly for the reason you state above. Just as > "nobody will want to accept an official registration polluted by > prior use", "nobody" (deliberately in quotes) will want to attempt > to establish an unofficial registration using the approach you've > described. Doing so is - at the very least - going to adversely > affect popularity and is very likely to result in interference and > potentially even litigation. "litigation"? Do we have prior art that this is a likely result? Spencer, honestly confused (for once)... _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms]… Gray, Eric
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms]… Spencer Dawkins
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms]… Gray, Eric