Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF
"Joe Abley" <jabley@hopcount.ca> Tue, 02 June 2015 14:29 UTC
Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4051ACCC7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4oJWAnhxg5dd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540C01A047A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgme6 with SMTP id e6so141590139wgm.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 07:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; bh=8ocb8Hj4Gsg+MdPLdpcs5ilS79IO1RlNtlWQePJyTrs=; b=IHrcdO/PtZlDwyw8jjmWxtZZ5DnbH+MVuLNNj7d+uunzzyh6KwgGQAlrsGg3LT0BpU H5gibmIsq1Sd2WaEDgICi84ZZQeyHcwF5FDGraMLA5xksj79Abq/ug6TkLXmn2uMgHld 7pEaTmoWNBwJcyX5y6y1GyMuIthfm26Td5Dy4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type; bh=8ocb8Hj4Gsg+MdPLdpcs5ilS79IO1RlNtlWQePJyTrs=; b=PJFNfBmn4F3JNyYirsfNBPz8oEp2edbCVST/WX9VsYDn+AygBvdNOTkj27k/4kQFbe N28uk8c+ClZaDlT0RaiaEMIolSGAyLXESdWgamq1LSBEyJzXNvz4v8C+x1ifYJx77XBE 8y1qQ4yMgr3tUkKDgtRLRh7gIFqf84sSxhGf+RKuK9dJeUdr7aotLaJK7ayv1xcAQS/v FajXYz59R92clmtfh6RTUXi8TtLM26xMUCHyK2S4D1A67DXHoqmnMa49ImM4QQKS2GUP ck397Yz/n1/qslkdf+QZ3cn1+8JcaYdpaCDCESNi26QiqvJrnHrfAsbsSiro/t5fT5XV IFNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntQUjffRWSOAxvnYp5GUH2UnSFjlitZPDeEZ4kr7R4QefNFVt0p29V672ibg+RERavm8S0
X-Received: by 10.180.20.238 with SMTP id q14mr329496wie.55.1433255344061; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 07:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.8.218] ([41.226.24.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ha4sm21961320wib.0.2015.06.02.07.29.02 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2015 07:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:29:00 +0100
Message-ID: <BCFC1983-A450-4000-BF9A-E94C240F4F10@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4D7CDD5E-5D04-4024-BE88-6248B54D6381@vigilsec.com>
References: <DD88F4E4-6BBA-4610-BB49-3158A26DF55B@hopcount.ca> <4D7CDD5E-5D04-4024-BE88-6248B54D6381@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_5359EDD5-0B79-4593-B65D-764FBEBFB963_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Mtx7Bu7YkpYZ8lZqGSVwgv_8L6k>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:29:07 -0000
Hi Russ, On 2 Jun 2015, at 15:07, Russ Housley wrote: > Some mail lists are configures to add a suffix to the message. Others, like this one, do not. Yep, I'm aware of why it happens. My point was more that there is at least the potential for some work to be done on the IETF end, not just on the IETF participant end, which suggests that some kind of decision from leadership could be useful. > Adding a suffix changes the content, and that action is guaranteed to break a signature. Sure, unless the suffix is added in a separate, unsigned MIME section, which is behaviour I have seen on some lists (my mail client shows me a signed section in the mail, and gives me a warning that not all of the message is signed). Joe
- Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption … Joe Abley
- RE: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Jari Arkko
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Xiaoyin Liu
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Xiaoyin Liu
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Joe Abley
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Hector Santos
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Joe Abley
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Måns Nilsson
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… John Levine
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… John Levine
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Nico Williams
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Nico Williams
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Joe Abley
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Joe Abley
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Joe Abley
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Paul Wouters
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Måns Nilsson
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Matt Mathis
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Warren Kumari
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Hector Santos
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Måns Nilsson
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… John C Klensin
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Joe Abley
- Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encrypt… Glen