IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: registries and designated experts

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Wed, 13 June 2012 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5F521F8642 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 05:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BqinBcJs9r2l for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 05:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D23F21F8637 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 05:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from /spool/local by e34.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <ietf@ietf.org> from <narten@us.ibm.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:49:51 -0600
Received: from d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.178) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:49:50 -0600
Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2563E40072 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:49:23 +0000 (WET)
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q5DCmpo5055328 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:49:07 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q5DCmZKN025704 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:48:35 -0600
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-76-134-249.mts.ibm.com [9.76.134.249]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id q5DCmVoR025269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:48:33 -0600
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id q5DCmSL6028424; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:48:29 -0400
Message-Id: <201206131248.q5DCmSL6028424@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Subject: Re: registries and designated experts
In-reply-to: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407B53CA1@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
References: <4FCDD499.7060206@it.aoyama.ac.jp><4FCDE96E.5000109@cs.tcd.ie> <4FD7083A.6080502@it.aoyama.ac.jp><4FD74FFC.3050905@stpeter.im><6.2.5.6.2.20120612073602.09c8cbb8@resistor.net><4FD786DC.4090403@gmail.com><B416CA36462A3CA8C721BDF5@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <4FD849A9.7000708@gmail.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407B53CA1@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> message dated "Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:08:41 +0200."
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:48:28 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 12061312-1780-0000-0000-0000066681FB
X-IBM-ISS-SpamDetectors:
X-IBM-ISS-DetailInfo: BY=3.00000281; HX=3.00000190; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000001; SC=3.00000002; SDB=6.00147686; UDB=6.00033703; UTC=2012-06-13 12:49:51
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, SM <sm@resistor.net>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:49:53 -0000

> Maybe an IESG statement on this respect can help here.

Is the existing text in RFC 5226 not sufficient? It contains extensive
text about the purpose and role of designated experts, and was revised
substantially the last time around to try and find a good middle
ground between being overly prescriptive and giving experts a "blank
check" to do what they want.

Nothing in the discussion I've seen so far in this thread seems at
odds with or beyond what is already in RFC 5226 (but I may be biased).

Thomas

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status