Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd)

Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> Fri, 15 April 2016 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EF012E77E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMADVShRLVdt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0B612E747 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id s79so130524098oie.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=2HMYtupWj9kB039DlovDQRBLQtQ+Q9ybYojQR7SQsm8=; b=CWc2THcSvE/iYhT6jwzwZMNGMGa5UdQwmjJi/qTiDOPzNsGYYrHgwlRj+DQCm0uSx3 wOkoGWs1nwR31KLHDbBrJR7scFqp/MBsDvkiGi7fjfztRlLvNCVcK5bAiovVVMhH1k23 3aXQB8cAcmuBwAlcFg9VLuwT+6zwsMqH9ySQI3p+fxfE8eAk9H92hKzXEX/9ee2xFDFH wZWW/p47lkuktusLp6nEdpsb9Bx2UZRVeN1oZ8R7BdQofsEKN1K1bqTflfv9S6NIkf6M O2GzWlS7ECWm7hrxteTWbZ6VsGo76HOr3u6Vmr/sPLkmLfx19HsIeElMfwvSdATp3h2M TAEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2HMYtupWj9kB039DlovDQRBLQtQ+Q9ybYojQR7SQsm8=; b=lDGjW8D0oF97bK7QeOEDoBdRk4lKFUhsSja0T/tGPrDEWmsb3SR8x19bo2f77iSNFs gwBeeSmCALewQsPuQbwue/vzrq075TBZRc2K5HhJwp0fBfnCFYxYehjxjLaGBdmuHCxs qCc3iCNiUodJLajU8GKO/lROt91Dzv4A4bjU1ZpLrq1Bl8JU8WtNJ9ukr2HysGPwDjtl Cmqt7LcSff0F2UbRUCkbPoQiN8t2yQO9behjtV+VnV2oZ9735xu1plxJJtZCKCbD6ooG HG0BMww0Ou8Pv0FP+4zOaoiNJ8+4VZf64Cmu7+MCd6Rm8QXyW6FMopqM93bBMBiro1vO nJNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVo4u+UtzVN8xxmEKHvdH17cEwbKWFu8y7JQAHycVANCcVbFwXjfLGXwIEM94loTfveKBofZl+jDlbWMw==
X-Received: by 10.157.32.114 with SMTP id n105mr5491568ota.69.1460740960731; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rwfranks@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.114.136 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1604151309440.27222@ns0.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1604151309440.27222@ns0.nohats.ca>
From: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:22:01 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: XHnVkcQGSLfUE69RAkIXOON1V9k
Message-ID: <CAKW6Ri6rzgYOZ-9xGFs5zHezbZ5RbUrVwGJag0JYKZZbft87Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd)
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1137c37412c8fa0530894296"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/N6Hfb84omlYsdObkQzod2h1nUDM>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:22:42 -0000

On 15 April 2016 at 18:11, <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

>
> Can we have a process where we disallow posting by _everyone_ on the
> attendees lists of previous IETF meetings? I think after 4 months there
> is no valid reason for allowing to post on those old lists anymore.
>

Is there any valid reason for the list to exist after 4 months?