Re: Transparency of IAOC

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 12 April 2016 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1429012D7E5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fOloY9yQsL92 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28B2012D9A1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id e190so42087931lfe.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b1j18z9lxvl7XAscNeDZSn0hLHtOaiYLQpha/nYw17o=; b=CIH7N86c1CFz41z5Qxd65qsJkufCjPrO9YneqU/rJ4Lpc2+o58G2sKIJWjdjPtEwGS L8jLaZzbCqKEz6Q5INRk2Scd6AjJi4kEezPZmeNAEWMNHzDju5NVY5wP6ksmxwQIRuoB ZxigU/N382sPBdQpCOd4DGVITDniRIUZrEC3FNjDDzSO/aXemdtYRe64/K6K4HejhbKU wGFEl6JFPiDOFnwSu4LVDubTXC9fZGchQZEvLJjsQfBpXl+l7HST8AiF2Yghk8noiEyH vK5IYKAXYkkHe3+bMi+UOBweEFWoj9taLYQTIefE0LoJADtNAscNkg5slAFdLX3hZLJz UPcw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b1j18z9lxvl7XAscNeDZSn0hLHtOaiYLQpha/nYw17o=; b=hglwSOMMeDwDTqU/WrTIWzwEUh01msLVZZ71g6lTWXXmalOihqCENHL6aps9xWnVpW nPnG8V/kI19lsRS6LNhp5Ojb8RNJ5RLLmv8qYPKR5gMstz1fD61cDrYcZ6op5HEN1sar X9B21Fo3k81UF8APCUShLlKt/zwgY55tLMk4AtoeRHPLJJILtL+RwCi406AM8dQ24u5/ sl7PHBuTf5VbEWyOdvKYKaGKNoJJGMw76nX3Se+ynt854flweEh07+CMlmNUEYCKDfU7 nTf2mZkP7MuvaLAOjvAV4snY2IoiMULWdj5HrO5tUMpYe2LD4hr2qyO7NXmRlTQJWD5Z LVbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVdg3sf2U3hsayiRQ9EDv7Td73rIdN50xOutvDHZUUcAESLDI3gWJspv7MKelp1fZvgF8pE60qL8Tf5uw==
X-Received: by 10.25.73.212 with SMTP id w203mr1992844lfa.22.1460493349409; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.40.136 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
In-Reply-To: <570D5B51.8090307@gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20160412031201.0da034e8@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160412114424.0e7061b0@resistor.net> <570D5B51.8090307@gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:35:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=CViQxgkZEGUY+0nvP0xyQJZHD8Ftecvu-rQ4oNeFgxA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Transparency of IAOC
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b159249ebcb05304f9b25
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NCNCFr6g0dly8lIQAvvPFDJD1tg>
Cc: SM <sm@resistor.net>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:35:58 -0000

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Maybe,
> > it will be viewed as politically incorrect and it is not good for a
> person's IETF career.  In other words, it is a matter of
> > perception.
>
> I think someone who's been asking tricky questions of the IAOC would
> be a very good candidate for Nomcom to consider for an IAOC seat


So, to paraphrase, "yes."