IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DMARC and ietf.org

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Sun, 20 July 2014 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62A71B27F0; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQHrL-tvBsuD; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F63E1B2CA7; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1405882469; x=1437418469; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2UD0CcXkjzgMEH91nrNo0C9+lpvGaUDXg5pzRAD8yr0=; b=bHBWeKQUCcC5SHoPNLH45vcvrX/LMJGnWtrVWrHtDYUYVl2nneZfUWkB CNzHseOsRRS84O6ck9TpBNwjF01/a3lUFk7NrxDGFL01PbNbYH6yZtnog pyuwNtK02rRyFhByjzCNdphNp7KTlE5lfR6wUIts22K4fUNXtKv7Bzsyi I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7505"; a="52873564"
Received: from ironmsg04-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.19]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2014 11:54:16 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,696,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="679208125"
Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by Ironmsg04-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 20 Jul 2014 11:54:15 -0700
Received: from dhcp-abf0.meeting.ietf.org (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:54:15 -0700
Message-ID: <53CC1055.1020200@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 14:54:13 -0400
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: DMARC and ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwYZPO9L9e7MHA6zP5vcTbQEJmwCSonLdMeQiOw4CUoiFw@mail.gmail.com> <20140718174827.652621ADAF@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <6.2.5.6.2.20140719235353.0c50d260@resistor.net> <25621.1405862805@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <25621.1405862805@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NCvKTim8taQ2d3IC31xGRNLTAl4
Cc: iaoc@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 18:54:32 -0000

On 7/20/14 9:26 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Regardless of how/if/why/when we process DMARC as a specification, we need to
> decide how ietf.org MTA is going to deal with things.
>
> [...]
>
> So, again, I'm not interested in what we might specify as an SDO.
> I'm interested in what we are going to *do* as an entity.
>    

I have delusions that those two should not differ significantly and that 
the WG can produce at least enough of an outline of what ought to be 
done in short finite time that the IETF's MTA folks will be able to make 
changes. That is, after all, the way our process is *supposed* to work. 
I understand the vastness of my delusions, but I am motivated to get 
phase 1 of the charter completed quickly.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email