IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> Wed, 05 April 2017 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C0512944C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 02:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GAjZ3Yp_AhUG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 02:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692B51201F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 02:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id r203so8842061oib.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 02:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=GsAHh0ZQrwsPEZ78aiCoOByqty5wdErNM0b0ltFd8eE=; b=gDDMHvTUCWTQVve9gAfZ8r9MCkaNGT9fvJWfR0dbHPwqsVeHPvBT2CtrR52keUjDZk jlImslqoAL2qRhOj8LyPrpAZeMlXTVOjS3vAVhfy7iVB8yYfDtuBmAS/IGh22Gv+g000 Zj+9gYtJhgz1R3SDEqitaaiz8tBs1zwCKrprbQ91PEVLwr0SJFlFVJaq6sLz2FP3nVkD 01RKjeSIzQUSlAWKfwJ1bxRt5gLMHKDc+5O5dmkYUi2aNso5ER2qr4dXL8rYpgassFpQ q8e98J5Ej1ejwiZ8nSOw6KK76SPXH3o0VJTqMc7B2WNOf3q9ioHRuGzGcLod99HUIAFx +WNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GsAHh0ZQrwsPEZ78aiCoOByqty5wdErNM0b0ltFd8eE=; b=Qap9ssGEGuCfw8pXf+0Wc0T4n9sycEmSNK6zSg5e8MHLNTXU+Pk7eLZ0HGYuimvi6p wnsR81U9pRU3gWuaJvlryt1fhnEdWbV8eKtAb0ef/dBCXYY2fIRyQTBwEM5ULCUqIZ9j OGQDIQjCyyENh+lfOjVgFnUVwOAQGtl9fz22Yn520m7QpcIYFJl6NT2uVXKMQkkl+Gpj 4NmiTA8k1+ebk010XpiCposBqJRQD+eYbHVcc8rAU4jsy7VfDEMJJlZWFUcLwttt2Bdi ll0WYxuZzi1ub+0xWaevyHFuNLasx3kmwDMoVCKOqJ5QAuG/VOhocTO3FbG7syS3wRWt WGKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1r7Gfs5D5lLrrE8/d1uwOqVFgdhT8/xIB6RoWruJn5CQ4hCbV0MYBXp6IX1kCeb3VI6cxK1juQANVlRQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.19.114 with SMTP id q47mr16432237otq.77.1491385630036; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 02:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rwfranks@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.42.106 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 02:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FBC8267C-32A8-4358-A0A5-C2A0A236318A@consulintel.es>
References: <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <2987213d-075e-beff-64f8-d316709c404a@cs.tcd.ie> <20170404204617.GC16732@puck.nether.net> <3D4D193E-0D41-44DD-BB0C-E7741A7A2260@gmail.com> <20170404221042.GC4004@localhost> <5d6085d5-c8d1-22f3-d9e7-a1a9294e655c@cisco.com> <FBC8267C-32A8-4358-A0A5-C2A0A236318A@consulintel.es>
From: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:46:29 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ay1sH6bNY6h4UICSezIscwOGQ3w
Message-ID: <CAKW6Ri59h1vC6pO=3UXa1kF4fwh=4LeJ+nU-zzT10RBXRNnicw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
To: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, ioac@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134fcc0b398b7054c6846f2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NDaAnDRHnUttb-Pu2pm2M0bBZDk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 09:47:13 -0000

On 5 April 2017 at 09:25, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
wrote:

> One important question here, same as we had in the case of Singapore.
>
> If we cancel San Francisco, how much that is going to cost to the IETF for
> each of two planned meetings?
>

>8


> 3) However, for already contracted meetings, if this is going to cost IETF
> thousands of dollars, we can’t afford that.
>

If the entire foreign contingent votes with its feet and stays home,
strikes me that IETF can't afford that either.


And further to your earlier remark:

The UK is, and will remain, a part of the EU until March 2019 in accordance
with Lisbon Treaty, Article 50.

PS  The Treaty of Utrecht has no equivalent of Article 50.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email