Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 12:10 UTC
Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621B53A16C7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYijInzMJI05 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-vi1eur04on0731.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe0e::731]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD6B23A16C4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 05:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=mM+H63YQ3Un208kDbiJD0EHPZHqexofHbUW/UmKd2FSzGgRUQWOt0DmlRJg9XnlbI5fNdxhfx7HLDWyPCCHmi27FR0kD17HNUWsbCWKNTFWVV9q2KXH7HJz1/6GXCf74ueHqIssMPnH0wYcVVTmXHEP5K778lul3zC2Lb2ClTTm6NaxEq8dq+kbqUmw0HkiRkkAfM4hhH9i+Hz38eyWLW63yMP56gEGPz+5iYOMMOh4FGpAOGeh+AgNWqGysM79zp5HBAESPQTLug4f67sG337cV+rjIL2Hx2ok3J2PGT/D17yJwwqhwKx+gqhkjfY2PxL28uWDDhSeotcLxANyAvQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=H07/eYDpjV+zDwEVI8UjbQLWvTdXaI8C0zqZDToOWBw=; b=MV3Bouc2KVWL2WKbKFMQtUQJ0LDSRlMHJe9vWyPNLpqfkXahkPJUpCFg/90Ss7VKBoPrfc895YyMnaHDsl+ke73PDcPlC+etOOVCTBDQvMBu9dKSuaihGNu7APwSXNWk6U6oXXXNt23KPGWAYN6FULOQ4JXCXSZ0vQQWM94hEy4C2sQ+tIojQIV6lpOdWOXgOChmSsVx1CqUBHL3aTW0LMQI2PahaG7LRCuKeE062xxTCuR7NbAfIlDS4dj+wV/MH94a/zdvNxIpW27utE0HjZvVSLUfk15BtWzZ0LU6UVEBfN+r7KgG6mYemehG+o51vG+mg/iP/3UY2cKexH3nag==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=H07/eYDpjV+zDwEVI8UjbQLWvTdXaI8C0zqZDToOWBw=; b=Qx5NC/pJk+fmUSQZ3axmgF2HNUnV9/N9tpRSUqtbkEqYDna7H6Jj6S4pRpwiui3xX5c27styioyjoCnlmtd3rqFpy9yZqFe1HnNuxYWfL0JsUC7raJggAs+KDi+hOID6GDUkSTKhwhVawEbKNB6DyMQaKB6g8m7bgMhq11rJcW4=
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=daedulus@btconnect.com;
Received: from VI1PR07MB3502.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.170.237.22) by VI1PR07MB3310.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.170.236.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2814.11; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:10:16 +0000
Received: from VI1PR07MB3502.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f888:6f80:7ae9:71ce]) by VI1PR07MB3502.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f888:6f80:7ae9:71ce%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2814.007; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:10:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <CALaySJKvdoy9MtzHMwq-Ew-EJoUs0V8t+y01FL-E5r3xdyRemQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw=yoTSzD4XUKEEojspW8=Bsfv9QzDqRz5S0fHR0Cda9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:10:09 +0000
Message-ID: <1UW5q6kOQ7.1wDRXqDDvh@pc8xp>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sw=yoTSzD4XUKEEojspW8=Bsfv9QzDqRz5S0fHR0Cda9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
User-Agent: OEClassic/3.0 (WinXP.2600; F; 2019-11-28)
X-ClientProxiedBy: LO2P265CA0200.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:9e::20) To VI1PR07MB3502.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:802:1a::22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from pc8xp (81.131.229.19) by LO2P265CA0200.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:9e::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2814.16 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:10:15 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [81.131.229.19]
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 7fc8621d-3baf-4b58-33b4-08d7c7477d41
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: VI1PR07MB3310:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <VI1PR07MB331073C286F5E2BD81D80784C6FA0@VI1PR07MB3310.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:10000;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 034119E4F6
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(396003)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(366004)(199004)(6496006)(6666004)(110136005)(956004)(16526019)(966005)(66556008)(2906002)(316002)(66574012)(53546011)(86362001)(9576002)(52116002)(66946007)(52230400001)(9686003)(55016002)(8936002)(66476007)(186003)(81156014)(81166006)(478600001)(45080400002)(5660300002)(4326008)(8676002)(26005)(33716001)(223123001)(130980200001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR07MB3310; H:VI1PR07MB3502.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: jLyS0AGdz57xiQlhxmeVk3YDNz4RkGMYPBQ7JAWW2TauclP18ixTEB4EU67S0sY8KSWQmswNNuC3kB93qaWgyOsJ3TK6TIZe6332Nh9xx9VzQ1qK1RC+tkki+WVUOenLokasYFvqH0f7asD1itGG5g==
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7fc8621d-3baf-4b58-33b4-08d7c7477d41
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2020 12:10:15.9501 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: ozQld658Mg8KjQxj9fVGjU4aKJGN8TCOaKW97kzh8qp4Jtrn9Z5CaP9/Zbzng5KZQqSV65RNCzr1HKGnt+t22A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR07MB3310
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NDbQx0IjbkChSA2VFCusPRLijuo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:10:24 -0000
----- Original Message ----- From: Rob Sayre sayrer@gmail.com Sent: 13/03/2020 06:36:22 Hi, In my view, the experiment is a success. <tp> A partial success. It took me a while to realise that Last Call announcements could not be found there. This was a particular issue last week when I blinked and while I did, in excess of 500 new posts appeared on the ietf-announce list making any last call announcement hard to find (My MUA support is wrecked and the web interface is primitive --- New Outlook Express and Windows Live Mail replacement - get it here: https://www.oeclassic.com/ ), I have found myself responding to a gen-art or secdir post which can only muddy the waters as my comments are totally unrelated to their comments, So to make it work, please post all Last Call announcements to the Last Call list; it is obvious really. Tom Petch </tp> It seems like the general IETF is currently concerned with issues not related to document review. thanks, Rob On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 2:14 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: As we discussed in the plenary session at IETF 105 in Montréal, some community members have suggested moving document last-call discussions onto a dedicated "last-call" mailing list, and off of the general <ietf@ietf.org> list. The latter is a high-volume list with a lot of varied discussion, and some think that it would be useful to separate the general discussion from the last-call discussion, to allow people to choose which discussions (or both) to follow. In the IETF 105 plenary, support was expressed for that separation. The IESG agrees, and wants to try an experiment to that end. We propose to create <last-call@ietf.org> and to direct last-call comments and discussions there (the last-call announcements would still go to <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, with "reply-to" set to the new list). That list would be monitored by volunteers recruited by the IETF Chair, and digressions would be nudged back to <ietf@ietf.org>, while we would ask people having last-call discussions on this list to please move them to the new list. We would get the tools team involved so that the distribution lists for directorate and review-team reviews would be updated appropriately. Our plan is to create the new list and pre-subscribe everyone who is subscribed to <ietf@ietf.org> at that time. Of course, anyone could unsubscribe to either or both lists immediately or later, but we think that doing it this way would minimize the likelihood that people would miss important stuff because of the move, and folks can choose what they prefer from there. After six months, we would do an initial evaluation, including getting feedback from the community, to see how the experiment is working. If it seems worth continuing we would do so, and at a point that the community decides that the experiment is a success (should it so decide), we would start an update to BCP 45 to formally move the location for last-call discussions, and we would update the 2007 IESG Statement on Last Call Guidance. We invite comments, here, on this plan, by the end of September. As I say above, we've heard support from the community for the general idea, and we'd like to make sure this direction is what the community wants. Barry, for the IESG
- Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-c… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Ross Finlayson
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Richard Barnes
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Tim Chown
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Tim Wattenberg
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Randy Bush
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Christopher Wood
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Tommy Pauly
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Rob Sayre
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Bob Hinden
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… S Moonesamy
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Pete Resnick
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… S Moonesamy
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… S Moonesamy
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Melinda Shore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Melinda Shore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Keith Moore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eliot Lear
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… avri doria
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Eliot Lear
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Barry Leiba
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Julian Reschke
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Melinda Shore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Keith Moore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Rob Sayre
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Pete Resnick
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John C Klensin
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Rob Sayre
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… John Levine
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Rob Sayre
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… tom petch
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Paul Wouters
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Robert Sparks
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Keith Moore
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Jared Mauch
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… tom petch
- RE: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… 7riw77
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for la… tom petch