Re: What ASN.1 got right

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 03 March 2021 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89163A16C2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:24:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bbyt5k4QPwyj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:24:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dragonfly.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (dragonfly.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34733A16C1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:24:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721791E2DB2; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 02:24:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (100-98-118-122.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.98.118.122]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0F4241E2AE7; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 02:24:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.98.118.122 (trex/6.0.2); Wed, 03 Mar 2021 02:24:36 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Good
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Broad-Snatch: 2413a4b52c25a2de_1614738276298_1185402716
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1614738276297:3450850173
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1614738276297
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D977E3D7; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:24:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=2CH2a4CvpPfw6f k7WBj9r9KcVmc=; b=OqEHyQKeYso+nSjp0JV5oy20ZuEVFovSUfLBs71uTz4TpT g99c/7xWhaigOqHJr2iy8dgMYGlI+SK7GjPHl91mzLsbMR+AWw20TzmxPbHnKJNa 9iVFMF7ypwHOzLBSyfMOfcwV723xlmHzMqVcu3uAaqAW4+bOVFMrwOKHcl22k=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1F627E3D2; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:24:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:24:32 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a14
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: What ASN.1 got right
Message-ID: <20210303022431.GF30153@localhost>
References: <CAMm+Lwj8QwuqaA3f625Ui8arc0TxY3uLXbG-PKToWGdtq8az6w@mail.gmail.com> <613072c6-5518-91e3-41b9-3b7590ee2346@mtcc.com> <CAMm+LwiEqL3bMg09e5NBNZwkPJ90DmQgLTy=SQNEN0q=vp=wrQ@mail.gmail.com> <ed6830b3-e650-d3fa-b253-9f53e01f9615@mtcc.com> <CAMm+LwifpPg-Sg9cXLpWvjmExt8KfuYq6oRZd4D1L0ZBR3nRFg@mail.gmail.com> <1631e20d-9d8a-b8c2-9d5e-6c7f4defa72d@mtcc.com> <20210302234928.GX30153@localhost> <CAKr6gn13eKWvS0meCs9MM-kCRsCD35CtH6_bsP5WeNbEnR7ing@mail.gmail.com> <fb9c261e-9ac0-aa4b-8817-d89b1142f1fc@huitema.net> <CAMm+LwhNJRLshBnTT-D+StAuk6tB1tECLvY0_mcKrxU8DHATuQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhNJRLshBnTT-D+StAuk6tB1tECLvY0_mcKrxU8DHATuQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NPqznz6Hr2-iVfYWusrFZG3h5wk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 02:24:39 -0000

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:17:55PM -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> The peculiar thing about SSH certs is that they only exist for servers, not
> for users. At least as far as I could see.

No, they exist for users.