Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473AF3A0CF3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12VgDQ5H0AbD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526D63A0CCA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1jCmKI-0002Gc-MM; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:34:18 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:34:13 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Message-ID: <6D1251C133F0A0B9ACBA996D@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <5dfa28e8-e0ae-c264-98f9-df7c88985ce7@gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <75d49afa-9b3d-5e81-a254-2559588b25d2@cs.tcd.ie> <5dfa28e8-e0ae-c264-98f9-df7c88985ce7@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NSTNwynNqdz6PJeSXHD11uYfPXA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:34:28 -0000


--On Friday, March 13, 2020 15:28 +0100 Alexandre Petrescu
<alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it would be safe to ask a candidate this:
> 
> "Have you attended 3 meetings recently? including online and
> de visu".

For better or worse, the current procedures require that the
Secretariat check volunteers for the Nomcom against attendance
lists.  Barry's two suggestions and mine effectively adjust the
lists they use.   Asking the candidates if they consider
themselves eligible instead would be a much more radical change/
adjustment.

    john