IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 21 December 2012 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E032621F84E6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:02:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iGAtQ3NGEHnC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3A721F87E4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBLJ2C2D004621; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:02:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1356116539; bh=VCAjRq/tVdx/LwdVfzJxCVmOK1ILdqjxjJ+LenzZs50=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=jC/RpHMKOKLksHRjuSUHeEmVUYes+ZFtctDIkYL0siQhouRhNjbJZUcjDUurJadYG whq/2ME9bQrzQhffAD9Gjx4aBiqp2CI5c6I7K+7EtKkwRbscL27ywq4/2a8Rc7T3Fy qGUk8sXvAN+l7bmevUsQxWvUpe6/aYLjOFVhvz/s=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1356116539; i=@resistor.net; bh=VCAjRq/tVdx/LwdVfzJxCVmOK1ILdqjxjJ+LenzZs50=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=DMwHu3VpMoAXTGNlsNRyG460T3cku5l5rLbxMqdGD5tXz9RRynAKMrvuKBXkFUXH9 0fZ1Quw9vl6y6Vj71ZMmlxSXAe5ug+YzE2MuGxhr9NDXvgoix81eHUqZT+2daWvze6 t/q/q1r5hbB3CdrsmQO8A7YqEhq+bYHV6HSGjFFQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121221103719.0c3d8cc8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:58:29 -0800
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
In-Reply-To: <50D47B76.7010009@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <20121129205534.8983.43593.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121129165519.0a037840@resistor.net> <50D3A040.4090706@qti.qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121220221257.0a828b40@resistor.net> <50D47B76.7010009@qti.qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:02:23 -0000

Hi Pete,
At 07:08 21-12-2012, Pete Resnick wrote:
>I am still confused. What is the action item here? Do you think 
>something needs to be fixed in this document?

It was an explanation instead of an actionable comment.  My 
preference is to deal with the IPv4 and IPv6 registries separately as 
it is easier to explain.  I am okay with not making any changes to 
the document as it is not worth spending more time on it.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email