Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 06 December 2014 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181EC1A9061 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 09:21:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eh_RrD-z3qWq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 09:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17CC1A9060 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 09:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C931BF18; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:21:27 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kZXt8hoDFZNM; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:21:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.11] (unknown [86.46.19.212]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9269DBEE8; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:21:25 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <54833B14.7010104@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:21:24 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
References: <20141206170611.39377.qmail@ary.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20141206170611.39377.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/N_mgxrXpyxMmf4-qV1yz6p99AV8
Cc: stbryant@cisco.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:21:29 -0000


On 06/12/14 17:06, John Levine wrote:
> PS: Thought experiment: Let's say we made RFC 20 a full standard.
> What Bad Things will happen?

Some people will be upset. Same as if we don't do that:-)

I'm fine with pushing this one along the stds track and
will kick that off next week. I need to go re-read whatever
process stuff is involved, but if someone wants to be the
shepherd for this, (I'm guessing one is needed/handy) then
just mail me.

S.

PS: If Barry or anyone else wants to do this instead that's
fine by me.