IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Fri, 12 November 2010 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B623A6B39; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:02:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J8mzaRJ80T7F; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:02:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00BB3A6B23; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:02:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so2111046ywp.31 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:02:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rItt/QoWeLLQRe+WHSAqhPit0INCZQYdxcAKMZTbacE=; b=Z/t+K5GPOkj/6SyROiDyjI/vR4QaKMmwmqoBAmjqd0liO9nw7/6GK6uVzsc3WLLx+P g7Cv/ndepsUXsIONJKLUep1ktBp3UOfqOviFhAU9j25mQzJqMGkbR0JgNVW2gdc44Tzc fPOJZyo3QqUQ+QGRinSxrciCoH3Tril+p08SQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=s3oNYjFkUj8Cc+5eoh/u5lMX54Zj0FvZR5+tt/mwFtKVOLNLldHI3s0vzzHeidxSRJ eik3c0DKhSYkp4fUEW0k0eBE/G7UDYtDEApoqBlgDQFWzY0WzXMn01+hgaV7PTkP8ehk k8CRIQIh5k/I5W4N0YJWRru6d4TvAvZXDhjG0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.138.16 with SMTP id l16mr1507723and.0.1289566959173; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.41.14 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:02:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C903537F.23A330%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
References: <2C6CC15A-EFCC-4E0B-B4A7-A1C4BD48416B@checkpoint.com> <C903537F.23A330%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:02:39 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=6hXNn5e2yaWMfv=+eKvXGG+F0dXOPE_WnM94d@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6434ae88401fe0494dab40e"
Cc: "iaoc@ietf.org" <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:02:08 -0000

The general tenor of this conversation seems to be:

* Paper badges that reveal our names: BAD - Privacy risk!
* RFID badges that allow our movements to be recorded: Cool - Technology!


How about paper badges with 2D barcodes? Its not like the performance of the
RFID wireless chips is exactly impressive.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email