Re: IAOC Request for community feedback

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Tue, 23 October 2012 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D9A1F042A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.541
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UU3xA8Ki7OtY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp177.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp177.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872121F0C59 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp57.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3B152F9081 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:55:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp57.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id BBC50F9083 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:55:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <5086E815.7060600@ogud.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:55:17 -0400
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IAOC Request for community feedback
References: <20121022234941.28301.7687.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20121023172013.918DC11E8099@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121023172013.918DC11E8099@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:55:29 -0000

On 23/10/2012 13:16, Michael StJohns wrote:
> Wait just one minute.....
>
>
> Marshal has neither resigned nor died (both of which would vacate the
> position).  He apparently *has* abrogated his responsibilities.
>

In even stronger terms: if a person after many years of involvement and
understanding of the rules, does not take the 5 minutes to write
a letter saying 'I resign from the IOAC', I wonder what triggered that
behavior.

> I'm willing to sign on to the petition.  I'm willing to volunteer for
> the recall committee.
>

Same here.

	Olafur