Re: So, where to repeat?

Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com> Thu, 09 August 2012 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <geoff@proto6.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7AF21F8750 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.149, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Odd6OZdBCFRY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.coslabs.com (mail.coslabs.com [199.233.92.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927AC21F874F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [199.233.92.4] (unknown [199.233.92.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.coslabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4A0D5F717; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:37:37 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <50240374.50608@proto6.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:37:40 -0600
From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat?
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com> <502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net> <AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|0ebd669a4eccc2cca00daf1beb84ed50o76MuX03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com> <01af01cd74f5$217e5770$647b0650$@us> <5021CDDE.8060207@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1208071937500.20339@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <B33DB90A-5819-4CEE-AE99-DAEC5CC5425C@proto6.com> <5022B4B2.8040904@bbiw.net> <79607D9B-40A1-4EE7-9C1A-B93B492D2802@proto6.com> <5023D21D.7030408@bbiw.net> <6F255DD8-325B-4FA1-AD65-2A75555260FA@checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <6F255DD8-325B-4FA1-AD65-2A75555260FA@checkpoint.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:18:58 -0700
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:37:43 -0000

On 08/09/2012 09:17 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>> offlist.
> Not so much
>
>> Geoff,
>>
>> Frankfurt is a city in Germany.  I believe the IETF has never been there.
> Two more tidbits:
>   - It's a huge aviation hub. There are direct flights from everywhere, similar to CDG, Heathrow, or Schiphol
>   - Unlike Paris, London and Amsterdam, it's not a great tourist attraction, so conceivably it would be cheaper.
I've found it relatively inexpensive, clean and very easy to get to.
>
>> Other than those two tidbits about it, I've no idea what is to be
>> accomplished by someone's randomly throwing out the names of cities for
>> a discussion like this, especially when threads like these always have a
>> great deal of trouble staying focused on the /principle/ rather than
>> haggling the details.
> The principle would be to go to aviation hubs so as to minimize the collective pain. Most people from the US going to Prague, would have a connection in Frankfurt, so a meeting in Frankfurt would reduce the amount of flights.
This is why I threw out a "not so random" city name - Frankfurt.
>
> Yoav
>
>> On 8/8/2012 12:24 PM, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
>>> Frankfurt?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/8/2012 11:46 AM, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
>>>>> So then why not consider, London, Paris (not the Concorde Lafayette), Frankfurt, Amsterdam?
>>>>
>>>> shockingly, amsterdam can't handle the ietf.  wrong mix of resources. really.
>>>>
>>>> paris appears to have broad crime and work-ethic patterns that also are problematic, not just at the concorde.
>>>>
>>>> to be clear: i'm speaking for myself.
>>>>
>>>> d/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Crocker
>>>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>>>> bbiw.net
>>>
>> -- 
>>   Dave Crocker
>>   Brandenburg InternetWorking
>>   bbiw.net
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.