Re: How to pay $47 for a copy of RFC 793

Steven Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu> Wed, 11 May 2011 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D00E07BA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WqxbJPgIbB0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from paneer.cc.columbia.edu (paneer.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDB8E079B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from barsoom.cs.columbia.edu (barsoom.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.21.109]) (user=smb2132 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by paneer.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4BKh72e008051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 May 2011 16:43:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: How to pay $47 for a copy of RFC 793
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Steven Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4DC9ACA3.7030808@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:43:07 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C5EDCF1C-E0EA-43A7-B1C4-FFC399F52DBF@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <4DC71403.9010505@isi.edu> <4DC9ACA3.7030808@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.4
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:43:13 -0000

On May 10, 2011, at 5:22 43PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:

> Bob Braden wrote:
> 
>> I wonder how many other IEEE standards contain similar
>> RFC-for-pay references..
> 
> It's common (much more than 50% for academic ones, IMHO) that
> sold articles are freely available on-line.
> 
> For example, a PDF file of the paper "End-to-end arguments in
> system design" can be purchased for $15 from:
> 
>   http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1145/357401.357402
> 
> which is the first link appears in google scholar search with
> the paper title, or, from:
> 
>   http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=357401.357402
> 
> to which the above IEEE link is redirected, but is available
> free of charge from:
> 
>   http://web.mit.edu/Saltzer/www/publications/endtoend/endtoend.pdf
> 
> which is the second link (next to google scholar one) with plain
> google search.
> 
> It is a lot more time (and money) saving to search free
> versions before entering transactions to purchase them than
> to rely blindly on PubMed, IEEE, ACM, google scholar etc.

Unfortunately, the IEEE has tightened its copyright policy; see
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/paperversionpolicy.html
for details.


		--Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb