IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF network incremental plan

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9011295DB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:02:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ALdaM64fp6l for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:02:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22b.google.com (mail-pg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 122B2129874 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:02:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id p66so87893869pga.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:02:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kG5genioWYB78tIotw4KLappYlOmZO7+Qwg80DpEfA0=; b=cGZhkTg5i7ChavoS17AUWBQGJPeper0/Xprxnx8KC2HRzbf9B6mA3kavFN5pyLEnpt HyuGrOp8s9YC/UGUfGlNDsDYA9jb2jn6+nZOvBTyN7nG30OsoPzaq4QFZVcnSdBG+L7s cvScHWI/sznFcITiKoTZeqdwDvcbq3tSN93L+JzNH/RNShJU2pW2p0i+N12iJfwJ1gXW Ae/jhH/h6aJ/3bBZ3yyOgcD3Y7VL07S/PRcf/VDrnNnvFPZI2uDTWrvKuiAWkdAtwq1K LHxY2CJ88daZAdcK40JvK3b5QvD2zWTHdQdA4y3x4fgCWS0J/xYhW5/JuN8Qv0cXZ4Sg +/hw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kG5genioWYB78tIotw4KLappYlOmZO7+Qwg80DpEfA0=; b=MMOh3B0QVnBZNNGBCSMOuEeGs2mUy0eXYHNDqvpERpj/SzDWP7sAeDa3sHCfgryJ41 87gDkDoP/BmguBCS6My70YT6nJUkrV5oMkNlbZZxmp1sUzc2CIlKNguqmZafJh+5KJLq uBSfaNnpGq22BBvX7jVo9NraPf4MlvMLGYZ4t2Yse1oFphvGornU8/MeDheUAQWY+Coh nH6FsudF0pDnZ6vcIjHgV/mQttWC3Rrc0wxSKGtjm0LnQjZwQ9YJOqnFmqp9VUbwHpFy 3y+CmVW9iqDdaK6vpwS2Q9onVsJfyImkFxzZ3OZBNa7k5nBIFrRmSjv5DQ8XrFYBtaGp 5/DQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfJZVzALhMKtvl9/uo9kL0HZc47tMQ2xRazph1IitDcY1rA0kJOu8yM2lBi6p0EUQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.160.29 with SMTP id r29mr2290037pfe.103.1479362541404; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:a587:3476:8fd4:8c18? ([2001:67c:370:128:a587:3476:8fd4:8c18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x90sm2650439pfk.73.2016.11.16.22.02.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:02:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: IETF network incremental plan
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <0C5BCD32-2D2A-42B9-8DEA-A1E1A527A8BB@consulintel.es> <m2zikzq7tg.wl-randy@psg.com> <dbcca137-9fef-723c-8fbd-edb12aff0b46@gmail.com> <04D0964A-B0E7-4F9C-A725-65D9429492E9@virtualized.org> <CAP4=VcjCTxrxhtoaN=fdbUr37zd1j9=aQP2BTgSca3o-rv91Mg@mail.gmail.com> <b4845eb1-ed01-48c0-1933-267494be480e@dcrocker.net> <C19E77B1-E10C-417A-8AEA-66CE12384F0F@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|51c4198b732c79300fcd57414ef2b957sAG5Dk03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C19E77B1-E10C-417A-8AEA-66CE12384F0F@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <ceb2d271-0e4f-b848-65dc-a6fbfefb9221@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:01:59 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|51c4198b732c79300fcd57414ef2b957sAG5Dk03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C19E77B1-E10C-417A-8AEA-66CE12384F0F@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Ntm7hDk5rhwGUOieEaxOZeMFDE0>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:02:25 -0000

On 11/17/2016 2:13 PM, Tim Chown wrote:
> The discussion isn’t about which networks are available, it’s about which is the default.


Thanks for mentioning this.  Switching defaults leaves the same range of 
service available and merely imposes a slight configuration change.

So I did note a reference to this point, but it didn't sound like a 
guaranteed arrangement.  Sounded like some folk wanted an arrangement 
with more restricted support.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email