IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Thu, 13 February 2020 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3211200C3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:38:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sv3WXcHt_Meb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1A741201DC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-20v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.116]) by resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id 2E87jtNNZQCNT2KJYjjcSO; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:38:20 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1581622700; bh=ccTY3ski4/zXMqoa4SiLF+KBzkg96UmLt9lFxnVzITs=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=DEk96Mmad6ltgPaJiTyOL6GonrMONCWM684FwA70yDGRiq2ZtsBXMnjXJDS55cO4W tLVgWCkAP7nPbuMGlrQoSIZMxOSQL68Tsu82vdyt4ZtFLw+XfCsg1q6MwApUEvhhZg J5A7LUHJIguwuYItBNb2eWTasu3/mFvUTtkN/a3pVa4POpCMJDiesbo/ZsKuEZ97lc mXC7ju5qt0QgwJ4cGLcNWIHoODUUyuRSxeeYlYNvZ3O0lodCBCIjff21z+yKMxfdrq 52/4HgXiwvOc/gjJcvEuymJf4dJVzvHy7v+8kzVYJdEe4gSMRC0RDrtilwQNnOe/5X qCQ8+V6xyItAA==
Received: from [192.168.1.123] ([173.73.206.126]) by resomta-ch2-20v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id 2KJQj443JTUlP2KJRjwH3N; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:38:18 +0000
X-Xfinity-VAAS: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrieekgdduvdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuvehomhgtrghsthdqtfgvshhipdfqfgfvpdfpqffurfetoffkrfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfuthflohhhnhhsuceomhhsthhjohhhnhhssegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepudejfedrjeefrddvtdeirdduvdeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddurdduvdefngdpihhnvghtpedujeefrdejfedrvddtiedruddviedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmshhtjhhohhhnshestghomhgtrghsthdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehivghtfhesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit
Subject: Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <VE1PR03MB54220BB50CB38B6F4A72FC58EE1A0@VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <eb39f2cd-7a27-e0ff-3be4-6d03d13f31b8@gmail.com> <DACFBEF8-93A6-429C-AF16-19E01A0BEA50@consulintel.es> <PR1PR07MB500133F262F9883BE4F60DFD911A0@PR1PR07MB5001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <D2E775EE-CEB8-414B-BDBD-666EE0E693EE@consulintel.es> <PR1PR07MB5001F523477A7074D8B2916F911A0@PR1PR07MB5001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <f0ee1a56-dcf9-c51a-f9c2-31da16b0b917@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:38:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <PR1PR07MB5001F523477A7074D8B2916F911A0@PR1PR07MB5001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Nu1At0ljH9btxGUcfG7XdOM_klg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:38:24 -0000

On 2/13/2020 2:23 PM, Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate) wrote:
> Yesterday 14000 new infected in Hubei region and more than 200 deads...just for info, right now.

Just to be clear - China has been reclassifying existing patients and 
broadened the criteria for "Corona virus case" and related deaths.  The 
majority of the 14000 (call it ~12000 given daily recent numbers of 
about 2K new cases) are NOT new cases, but represent cases already known 
but not previously classified as CV cases.   Ditto for the deaths - call 
it ~100 deaths (given the ~100/day recent numbers) that occurred 
previously, but that are now classified as CV deaths.

In any event, one day does not represent a trend.

mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email