RE: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 18 March 2016 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA11112D7AC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 02:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z81p9lwks65n for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 02:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-nor34.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6274612D538 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 02:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr06.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.70]) by opfednr22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 3A0872030F; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:17:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.27]) by opfednr06.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 14A351A0051; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:17:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM7C.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::8007:17b:c3b4:d68b%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:17:20 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic
Thread-Index: AQHRgIFq98lTHlXLrU2jL2Q0kuGvs59eASqAgABwRwCAAHq9MA==
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:17:20 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008D18426@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20160317191526.8948.67217.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56EB0FE9.5020602@gmail.com> <56EB6E18.30503@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56EB6E18.30503@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NxpnmEWggxjtVfB_q0_LWdJdYYQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:17:26 -0000

Hi Brian, 

RFC1475 is already obsoleted. The status change asks also to deallocate IP version 7.   

I support this status change. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Brian E Carpenter
> Envoyé : vendredi 18 mars 2016 03:55
> À : ietf@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-
> 01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic
> 
> After some private email from Scott:
> 
> The registry also assigns 7 to TP/IX, which became CATNIP.
> 
> So 7 also needs to be changed to Reserved and RFC1707 and RFC1475
> both need to become Historic.
> 
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers/version-
> numbers.xhtml#version-numbers-1
> 
>    Brian
> 
> On 18/03/2016 09:13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > If we are doing this, then I think that CATNIP (RFC1707) needs to be
> made
> > Historic at the same time, even though it didn't need an IP version
> number.
> >
> > I also recall rumours that some people were actually using ST2 at one
> point.
> > Are we sure that it's totally gone away?
> >
> > Regards
> >    Brian Carpenter
> >
> > On 18/03/2016 08:15, The IESG wrote:
> >>
> >> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
> >> Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document:
> >> - 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic'
> >>   <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic
> >>
> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally, comments may
> be
> >> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> >>
> >> The file can be obtained via
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-
> historic/
> >>
> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-
> historic/ballot/
> >>
> >>
> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> >>
> >>
> >>