Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Tue, 09 December 2014 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BFA1A0362; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 04:46:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUJNgNVni7it; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 04:46:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B7F81A0248; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 04:46:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyn-fg122.sth.netnod.se (dyn-fg122.sth.netnod.se [77.72.226.122]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91A77230BC; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:46:37 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2481DB87-72C7-49B4-A484-F1580CDE074B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b3
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <20141209051133.GK11221@localhost>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:46:36 +0100
Message-Id: <5648AF40-5E6E-45EB-B65D-3EA01EA9F24E@frobbit.se>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936289DC7@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <89601952-AA04-44EE-A6DA-E76D0AB07C21@frobbit.se> <20141207180528.GA1116@mercury.ccil.org> <D4E95FE1-0C25-4541-8327-16313175F13A@frobbit.se> <20141207210754.GA18507@mercury.ccil.org> <20141209033708.GB11221@localhost> <D95DA864-586D-41DD-A22E-3B0B8AB456D6@frobbit.se> <20141209051133.GK11221@localhost>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OIxQF-kVj-JnUF96zUmAg1adj0k
Cc: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org)" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:46:41 -0000

> On 9 dec 2014, at 06:11, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> 
> I received one off-list response that RFC3629 would be inappropriate
> because Unicode is a versioned standard.  But here we want a UTF, not
> all of Unicode, and surely UTF-8 is stable.

RFC3629 has no limitation based on Unicode version. The limitation is that it only defines UTF-8 for the UTF-16 accessible range, U+0000..U+10FFFF.

   Patrik