IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: "professional" in an IETF context

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Mon, 01 November 2021 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5596D3A13B9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 07:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7NCBJ5Ut7-2X for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 07:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E915C3A139B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 07:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4025 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2021 14:56:07 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 1 Nov 2021 14:56:07 -0000
Message-ID: <4ec32d7a-a17b-635b-91bc-4152313d6800@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 23:58:24 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1
Subject: Re: "professional" in an IETF context
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <8F4B97EA-665F-4A59-B99D-791B4AB9F2F7@yahoo.co.uk> <746C1453-FFB0-46E5-ABF2-8630DC23B959@network-heretics.com> <c3e9fe1b-8e48-a364-9e25-4084dac70889@meetinghouse.net> <3a6bf8ad-5492-0942-a451-6317e8a93705@network-heretics.com> <3e685576-a230-a7c4-f371-d66a55aa820d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <7a087707-499f-e3bf-8701-1a58930a8a22@meetinghouse.net>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <7a087707-499f-e3bf-8701-1a58930a8a22@meetinghouse.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ONGhrlAjCH36zSLOYlZK098EkgM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 14:58:31 -0000

Miles Fidelman wrote:

>> And the goal should be to prevent IETF perform meaningless 
>> engineering such as development of stupid protocols, including but
>> not limited to, IPv6 and LISP.

> Now THIS seems like a living example of something that is both 
> unprofessional AND uncivil.

Thank you very much for clarifying that requiring to be "professional"
or "civil" means prohibiting fair criticism against poor engineering
results.

							Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email