Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-org-11

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Tue, 23 October 2018 11:36 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A072D130ED1; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 04:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-org.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org
Subject: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-org-11
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.87.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154029461160.31381.9489360942358664833@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 04:36:51 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OXZ2CVVlGWJSWyDUUklgxSavQns>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:36:52 -0000

Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-regext-org-11
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2018-10-23
IETF LC End Date: 2018-10-08
IESG Telechat date: 2018-10-25

Summary: This is a well written document, and ready for publication.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: There is an RFC 2119 warning, which I don't
understand, but which the RFC Editor would normally resolve.