Protocol Action: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol to Draft Standard
The IESG <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Wed, 29 January 1997 18:49 UTC
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa25211; 29 Jan 97 13:49 EST
Received: from ietf.ietf.org by ietf.org id aa24751; 29 Jan 97 13:42 EST
To: IETF-Announce:;
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
Cc: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Sender: ietf-announce-request@ietf.org
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: Protocol Action: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol to Draft Standard
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 13:42:27 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: scoya@ietf.org
Message-ID: <9701291342.aa24751@ietf.org>
The IESG has approved the following documents:
1. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
<draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-09.txt>
2. DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions
<draft-ietf-dhc-options-1533update-06.txt>
3. Interoperation Between DHCP and BOOTP
<rfc1534>
4. Clarifications and Extensions for the Bootstrap Protocol
<rfc1542>
as Draft Standards. These documents are the product of the Dynamic
Host Configuration Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Frank
Kastenholz and Jeffrey Burgan.
Technical Summary
The first document describes The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
(DHCP) which provides a framework for passing configuration
information to hosts on a TCP/IP network. DHCP is based on the
Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP), adding the capability of automatic
allocation of reusable network addresses and additional configuration
options. Configuration parameters and other control information are
carried in tagged data items that are stored in the "options" field
of the DHCP message. The data items themselves are also called
"options. "The second document specifies the current set of DHCP
options. The third document describes the interactions between DHCP
and BOOTP network participants. DHCP provides a superset of the
functions provided by BOOTP. The last document attempts to clarify
and strengthen the BOOTP protocol specification which was loosely
defined in the original specification.
Working Group Summary
The Working Group came to consensus and there were no significant
changes as the result of the last call.
Protocol Quality
These protocols have been reviewed by Frank Kastenholz and Jeffrey Burgan
of the IESG. There are several independent implementations of DHCP
available today. A partial list includes:
FTP Microsoft cisco Sun IBM
Included below is a list of information about several DHCP implementations,
in support if the requirement for independent, interoperable
implementations before acceptance of the protocol specification as a Draft
Standard. The list is only a partial list of available implementation; I