Protocol Action: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol to Draft Standard
The IESG <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Wed, 29 January 1997 18:49 UTC
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa25211; 29 Jan 97 13:49 EST
Received: from ietf.ietf.org by ietf.org id aa24751; 29 Jan 97 13:42 EST
To: IETF-Announce:;
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
Cc: dhcp-v4@bucknell.edu
Sender: ietf-announce-request@ietf.org
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: Protocol Action: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol to Draft Standard
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 13:42:27 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: scoya@ietf.org
Message-ID: <9701291342.aa24751@ietf.org>
The IESG has approved the following documents: 1. Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-09.txt> 2. DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions <draft-ietf-dhc-options-1533update-06.txt> 3. Interoperation Between DHCP and BOOTP <rfc1534> 4. Clarifications and Extensions for the Bootstrap Protocol <rfc1542> as Draft Standards. These documents are the product of the Dynamic Host Configuration Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Frank Kastenholz and Jeffrey Burgan. Technical Summary The first document describes The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) which provides a framework for passing configuration information to hosts on a TCP/IP network. DHCP is based on the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP), adding the capability of automatic allocation of reusable network addresses and additional configuration options. Configuration parameters and other control information are carried in tagged data items that are stored in the "options" field of the DHCP message. The data items themselves are also called "options. "The second document specifies the current set of DHCP options. The third document describes the interactions between DHCP and BOOTP network participants. DHCP provides a superset of the functions provided by BOOTP. The last document attempts to clarify and strengthen the BOOTP protocol specification which was loosely defined in the original specification. Working Group Summary The Working Group came to consensus and there were no significant changes as the result of the last call. Protocol Quality These protocols have been reviewed by Frank Kastenholz and Jeffrey Burgan of the IESG. There are several independent implementations of DHCP available today. A partial list includes: FTP Microsoft cisco Sun IBM Included below is a list of information about several DHCP implementations, in support if the requirement for independent, interoperable implementations before acceptance of the protocol specification as a Draft Standard. The list is only a partial list of available implementation; I