Re: What's happening with directorate reviews?

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 07 December 2016 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6E7129FB0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:23:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLd6kPqDUqlm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:23:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB1F129FB7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517792CC9A; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:23:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MdOpVDjZLFXr; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:23:25 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1462CC95; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:23:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: What's happening with directorate reviews?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_99D540A3-5A16-4CE3-956D-D71476616934"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEFDUw1VZGcQN=eB0xSaC8+S16p0wS142Wz7EtvZ9LTutQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:23:24 -0600
Message-Id: <C7529659-7B61-4B60-98BA-BCBBB98846DB@piuha.net>
References: <CAF4+nEFDUw1VZGcQN=eB0xSaC8+S16p0wS142Wz7EtvZ9LTutQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OgaXWxOzECyajecxBmRpza7QAbk>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:23:57 -0000

> So, are we heading for a situation where all Directorate review will
> come through in a way that you can't tell what directorate it is or
> who did the review without opening the mail? And that just doing a
> reply-all will uselessly send the response to the Secretariat?
> 
> Seems to me that generally in the past such messages were from the
> reviewer and the Directorate name appeared in the subject and
> reply-all usually did the right thing...

It is a bug, not a feature.

Jari