Re: multihoming, was IPv10

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 30 December 2016 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED714129A40 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:39:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yDCjZIOsuEW4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:39:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D340B129A54 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:39:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cMn66-0007RJ-0j; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:39:10 +0000
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:39:08 +0900
Message-ID: <m2r34q5eer.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: multihoming, was IPv10
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612292057480.38763@ary.qy>
References: <20161229162721.34651.qmail@ary.lan> <20161230015709.EF91C5E15F13@rock.dv.isc.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612292057480.38763@ary.qy>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OgkdxDT10JohdNHF3hsKIrDYPi4>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:39:13 -0000

it's fun to have this discussion all over again, for some value of fun.
in this case, i agree with john, we do not make it easy.  that so many
reply with 'advice' qed.

but for some possibly new data on the embarrassing large extent of cgn
deployment, here is the book

    "A Multi-perspective Analysis of Carrier-Grade NAT Deployment:"
    Philipp Richter (TU Berlin), Florian Wohlfart (Technische
    Universität München), Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez (ICSI), Mark Allman
    (ICSI), Randy Bush (Internet Initiative Japan), Anja Feldmann (TU
    Berlin), Christian Kreibich (ICSI /Lastline), Nicholas Weaver
    (ICSI), Vern Paxson (ICSI / UC Berkeley)
    https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2987474  (no paywall)

and the movie

    https://ripe73.ripe.net/archives/video/1244/

randy