Re: My views on the Scenario O & C
Erik Huizer <e.huizer@utwente.nl> Sat, 25 September 2004 22:36 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA22161; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:36:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CBLHB-0002Vl-U7; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:44:22 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CBL6g-00049a-CF; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:33:30 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CBL5F-0003uc-LG for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:32:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA21715 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.25]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CBLCX-0002Qi-B0 for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:39:33 -0400
Received: from NOBKA051L (202-207.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.207.202]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8PMVpV9037012; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:31:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from e.huizer@utwente.nl)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:30:41 +0200
From: Erik Huizer <e.huizer@utwente.nl>
To: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <B6A1C76CA08B1BFE650B79C5@NOBKA051L>
In-Reply-To: <20040925210911.GJ3208@sbrim-w2k01>
References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040924123858.01deecd8@mailhost.iprg.nokia.com> <20040925110025.GZ2280@sbrim-w2k01> <FC591C92FBFA91376029888A@NOBKA051L> <20040925210911.GJ3208@sbrim-w2k01>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: My views on the Scenario O & C
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I just wanted to avoid the wrong impression. Building in strict guarantees makes sense. Erik --On zaterdag 25 september 2004 17:09 -0400 Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 01:57:50PM +0200, Erik Huizer allegedly wrote: >> Your remark suggests that ISOC let the IETF down on non-technical >> issues that the IETF was expecting to handle. > > Erik, that was not my intention. What I want to avoid is the feeling > that the friendliness of who we deal with, whoever it might be, might > allow us to be more relaxed in our handling of non-technical issues. > Does that make sense? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- My views on the Scenario O & C Bob Hinden
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Sam Hartman
- ISOC [Re: My views on the Scenario O & C] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Scott W Brim
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Erik Huizer
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Scott W Brim
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C Erik Huizer