Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 26 December 2014 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0A01A9098 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:12:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAopSqnA1oSL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:12:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 171A51A9091 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:12:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F88920098; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:17:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 3CEA0637FE; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:12:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CE1637EA; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:12:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
In-Reply-To: <549D8C57.8090402@nostrum.com>
References: <ED473823-2B1E-4431-8B42-393D20BA72DF@piuha.net> <549D8C57.8090402@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:12:29 -0500
Message-ID: <9103.1419613949@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OsnnKNpffgVeXJZvIZZWEpAifOY
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:12:31 -0000

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
    > Why did you settle on a proposed name for the combined upper-layers
    > area that implies it will be sleeping?

Good question.
I figured "NetAPP" was taken :-)

Here is perhaps the worst alternative I can think of:
    Networked Applications and Transport (NAT).

and yet...

I too would like a more inspired name.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-