Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Mon, 20 July 2009 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBC63A63EB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z5yW50WTZsIN for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AFB3A6A04 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id E30CC1AAF49A; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:28:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: henk@ripe.net, sob@harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
In-Reply-To: <4A642699.4040300@ripe.net>
Message-Id: <20090720102830.E30CC1AAF49A@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:28:30 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:38:43 -0000

> Aren't RFC 5377/5378 (and subsequent discussion) such a statement?

sorry - I must have missed the announcement by the trust that 
they were responding to these RFCs 

Scott