Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe

Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net> Fri, 13 September 2013 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823E611E8113; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GzNauKA-LDIl; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sg2plout10-02.prod.sin2.secureserver.net (sg2plout10-02.prod.sin2.secureserver.net [182.50.145.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C874911E8212; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.104] ([124.120.29.163]) by sg2plout10-02.prod.sin2.secureserver.net with id QdsN1m0033X9XZG01dsPzD; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:52:25 -0700
Message-ID: <52331896.8040906@net-zen.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:52:22 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Subject: Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128B4B92@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128B4B92@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:13:58 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe.all@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, gwz@net-zen.net, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:52:33 -0000

On 08/21/2013 09:20 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:

> Dear authors of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe,
>
> Please confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 for this document have already been filed. The confirmation from each of you is necessary in order to progress the document towards IESG approval.
>

Network Working Group                                            G. Hunt
Internet-Draft                                              Unaffiliated
Intended status: Standards Track                                A. Clark
Expires: November 15, 2012                                      Telchemy
                                                                    Q. Wu
                                                                   Huawei
                                                                R. Schott
                                                                       DT
                                                                  G. Zorn
                                                              Network Zen
                                                             May 14, 2012


                 RTCP XR Blocks for QoE Metric Reporting
                    draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-01

Abstract

    This document defines an RTCP XR Report Block including two new
    segment types and associated SDP parameters that allow the reporting
    of QoE metrics for use in a range of RTP applications.

Status of this Memo

    This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
    provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Dan
>