IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF privacy policy - update

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Thu, 08 July 2010 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3388E3A6946 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 22:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.246
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.353, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tYwuXMpvl6J5 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 22:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD973A680C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 22:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (72-255-3-211.client.stsn.net [72.255.3.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 581A51ECB408 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 05:00:52 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:00:49 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF privacy policy - update
Message-ID: <20100708050049.GD61335@shinkuro.com>
References: <9C72FA78-C9C2-4719-9BFD-112ABEFA7117@cdt.org> <56522CF0-088B-4027-AF45-A6075A7EA666@muada.com> <51D591B3-1954-47A6-A40A-7DCE6DDD5CF0@cdt.org> <A68985E3-A34B-47AB-A6A2-E6718E505652@muada.com> <B75D4F49-2361-4706-A24A-D5E7026EE58D@cdt.org> <573C3FFA-B8CA-4B71-9128-07863DF1CF2B@muada.com> <tsl630r6pj1.fsf@mit.edu> <p06240828c85a8b88005c@[10.20.30.158]> <3FCBDD68-E847-4E31-9DD6-486BE549005F@cdt.org> <p06240830c85a9f5da61b@[10.20.30.158]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p06240830c85a9f5da61b@[10.20.30.158]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:00:50 -0000

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 02:30:30PM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:

>If the cost is near-zero

Given the number of messages so far, the denial of the antecedent is
already assured.  There is a clearly non-zero cost to this effort.
(This is not an argument about whether a privacy policy is needed;
it's simply an empirical observation about whether associated costs
are near-zero.)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email