IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])

Scott Brim <swb@employees.org> Tue, 10 February 2009 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <swb@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6313A6A82 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:12:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ug2hAWHw30Uj for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:12:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B6C3A6A8D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:12:22 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,187,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="36566342"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2009 17:12:25 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n1AHCPPi011542 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:12:25 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1AHCPXM026052 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:12:25 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:12:25 -0500
Received: from cisco.com ([10.86.245.93]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:12:24 -0500
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:12:17 -0500
From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest" mailing list])
Message-ID: <20090210171217.GA6465@cisco.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <4990CC68.2000200@dcrocker.net> <20090210012022.GK920@cisco.com> <5073352A-C49F-4603-962A-B4DC5A9E9C90@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5073352A-C49F-4603-962A-B4DC5A9E9C90@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Feb 2009 17:12:24.0715 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE1AA5B0:01C98BA2]
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=swb@employees.org; dkim=neutral
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:12:23 -0000

Excerpts from Cullen Jennings on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 09:40:55AM -0700:
>
> On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
>
>> Dean's mail does not hurt any of us.  OK, it does take a minute of
>> our time to unsubscribe but that's it.
>
>
> In my opinion it is not alright for someone to harvest email address
> off and IETF list then subscribe all those people to some list they
> did not consent to be on?

I see your point, but does it warrant a perpetual irrevocable ban on
all interactions?  

> PS. I would also like to point out that though Dean may allow Scott
> to  unsubscribe, there are many people that he does not allow to
> unsubscribe.

Are you sure of that?  Have you tried?

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status