IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards

Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz> Thu, 26 May 2016 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <michal@krsek.cz>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E04D12D0BF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 02:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=krsek-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VLpsmiQf2DPY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 02:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5D512D5A4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 02:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id z87so92544625wmh.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 02:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krsek-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7tuASzerWPXC355uPJ9D1cKnNa/h4hD8hIciXfPOySY=; b=gmtfGDRVzbKRNng4rG1Vo/3K0HfRRKerG1rn58G01Xnzig0f6lNZo2mQsFoxAs4pKB 6VzMcNxMHjiiRVC3mrd62+CDQKQwWK9l7D7KTKuNipylqyc5N+GQfPSRHQwB1IRUUfd2 pzZGYk0svmR1s6SYmhnpSlMULI5HWSqj4MDIf7NcRR953oPYscV8XnbkMB9gtj1yZ8OL uH7yNDWs1wcrpHJQbv0mCcMxNJIysZCAGWuRk1J8tF99YhL3ml2F4dCgef59G1rUJ7d4 nySjr1IeX947COX9aZVX/kSYHSgNzVfw22ydMkZGTZ0yRkvhtKNmSvok+9OWfUN6Z65c e5RA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7tuASzerWPXC355uPJ9D1cKnNa/h4hD8hIciXfPOySY=; b=PG0rK9edoxpGI8GcoBFxCwP80OvA9HddHK1tON3hnGh9dxLFVOsmLz+aag8yDzkwbx T4YJ3+PkGnM5eUpO5j5mYTwV6UgbhvFGv+D9EsMSx2/fomkHyZ3QYSOERuCvx5L99PVI XpT8+5osn7DojjZAi58hNxKj2dBsAzjgrvkoBCSpgqDNTq9Gf1FgQnK1sLA04GO4Csnl xjzLIPCbYIgVv8Ptl6qRam99hY0MMhebcrPGQaiEm8AJgY98nRun7bGPQpUx1y3KfDAt GgVsMrwcNMuti69SYRJlsPVccG63RitmQEiagGMSzUMSDGdMy9nhPLv8r41K9ISMzm3E ar+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ8HNbTesox59WdTJEVCR65LVrzX8/7RBIUlqSL6z3qqOfdA/jQGS6YijBknN6Xlw==
X-Received: by 10.194.106.41 with SMTP id gr9mr8438678wjb.161.1464256492328; Thu, 26 May 2016 02:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.148] (ip-37-188-236-127.eurotel.cz. [37.188.236.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lm1sm13467448wjc.25.2016.05.26.02.54.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 26 May 2016 02:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
From: Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13F69)
In-Reply-To: <5746C0D7.6030205@afnic.fr>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:54:50 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3FA00BB1-A354-4562-BAF3-FD0E19E4D7C5@krsek.cz>
References: <58598992-449C-4E2B-867D-12D04236AB3A@thinkingcat.com> <D7078B9A-AF4B-4D40-A8D7-CD7C42DE3218@cooperw.in> <D95B9AE8-5B5A-4882-A371-3C5825179FC8@thinkingcat.com> <cbbc3530-fe39-a9f3-084a-0458c9961f5b@nostrum.com> <1A202503-3128-4726-8E35-9AB76028D765@thinkingcat.com> <5746C0D7.6030205@afnic.fr>
To: Sandoche Balakrichenan <sandoche.balakrichenan@afnic.fr>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PHyhOFL-JrtRkHwKrVGQLLPJoWQ>
Cc: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 09:54:57 -0000


>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thanks, a cogent summary, though I think it underplays a couple of key
>> points:
>> 
>> 1/ the cost of backing out of Singapore at this date (this is the
>> picture we’re trying to put together in a way that will be useful for
>> public consumption)
>> 
>> 2/ whether a broader range of people than have failed to unsubscribe
>> from the IETF@ mailing list are on board with canceling (there are a
>> few different conversations that are going on in the background and
>> they are not all supportive of canceling).
> ==> I do agree with cancelling Singapore, if the IETF will consider for
> all future events issues which hinder the actual participant from
> attending an IETF event. For e.g. Visa obtention. If the IETF is not
> able guarantee visa for an aspiring IETF participant, then will it
> cancel such a venue?
> 
> Haven't we opened a can of worms?

Not really, as HMS (Her Majesty Ship) Illustrous is ready for sale. With "some" maintenance she is able to leave UK. 

So who is starting collecting money of kickstarter? Guessing 50.000.000 GBP may cover the bill.

Michal

P.S: excuse my irony, but ...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email