Re: is there a specific proposal for living ops docs? (was: Re: Evolving Documents (nee "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.)

john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Fri, 19 July 2019 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C6A120666 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VDJl9maKWGBr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC121203F2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 47E642457E; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:45:25 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:45:25 +0000
From: john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: is there a specific proposal for living ops docs? (was: Re: Evolving Documents (nee "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.)
Message-ID: <20190719194525.GI38674@shrubbery.net>
References: <144ff436-a7a2-22f7-7b06-4d0b3bcfefac@joelhalpern.com> <20190719041456.GL33367@vurt.meerval.net> <254fc5f6-3576-a62f-b84f-a7c5d29b0055@joelhalpern.com> <a1561aa7-5f41-0e2a-1892-cfb587196ac0@gmail.com> <C3D53639-C2C0-42CE-9708-99294091E012@puck.nether.net> <a17a8648-14c8-1889-4ee3-86996ff6281e@gmail.com> <3B0C189A-D56B-430F-82FF-19DE0DC788DE@puck.nether.net> <BA80E73F53C26B9191294131@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <20190719190534.GG38674@shrubbery.net> <4f43fac6-ed7f-08ca-d5da-1e84b0a7b12b@network-heretics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4f43fac6-ed7f-08ca-d5da-1e84b0a7b12b@network-heretics.com>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PHz1nH3HLA-X8nx3ExaQfhslDfY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:45:27 -0000

Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 03:24:03PM -0400, Keith Moore:
> It seems like we've reached a point of diminishing returns with this 
> discussion since AFAIK we don't actually have specifics to evaluate or 
> argue about.    Maybe the next thing to do for those who want to propose 
> this for ops is to go off and write an I-D proposing mechanisms and 
> processes?    One that could address the expressed concerns?   Any 
> process change has to earn IETF consensus after all.
> 
> (or if I missed the I-D that proposes mechanisms and process, please 
> point me to it)

there is a side meeting at 105 that will be hosted by Kumari.  I am not
attending and do not believe there is remote participation support.  I
am hoping that folks will report to the maillist.

Thrs 8:30-9:45  Side Meetings / Open Time

https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/105/side-meetings/