Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AA721E812C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XBo27EjU2FLg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BF521E812A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bj3so7997230pad.28 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Lfw2xxoC1vq6LyrNIc+LxbOWL84dEmcJzc+IqfztiK8=; b=dhMmgrrjIcyj5CP3EX00ffT3QuPe+gh7N5scZTT2CWFBOmVH658oMqA793Xdm2/1gK 9b2xIDxIPndRt63bTA3JS7X96fh0uYRD1IvZ+J74UsafIXgnH4yoJwkzROsQQ3smbC26 WuY5mSWznH0uQ5wX0980ydTfMi27od4KvhemKClp4J/imeTDyt4a1zBlEPfiZgKglckC PmxrWfvZRIk7ri5W2s2wFfoWkrxY83EpndEPQ/lSWdF8VGtOX+ZuBbZECaHCJwL8NGhO yFTGT80wOrlFySV1yAPkL0XHCd7H7vJJIcTFDJpV4MnNsoQAP3WGyvqFm2enTTnBm70z Nwvg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.52.10 with SMTP id p10mr12833073pbo.92.1371826121988; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.78.164 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51C44E64.1050203@cisco.com>
References: <201306140453.r5E4r4q7002802@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com> <CADnDZ8-_KsQnZYy7tih5feNr7DMXJKtivfxw5BSRTmCHM7FsmQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C44E64.1050203@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:48:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-GkyGN4an+NfyncC07ov5RnYrvBjYxEC7VWS5TsuPQSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: stbryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec54307a0b1e03304dfab2821"
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:48:48 -0000

Hi Stewart,

I don't have any problem with the report/reminder only that it has missing
important information. The subjects of discussions are not counted, so I
counted them. Also the report does not distinguish between general-posting
and replying to IETF LCs.

AB


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> wrote:

>
> AB
>
> Thomas started posting these weekly reports many years
> ago as a service to the community to remind us all that
> posting to ietf@ietf.org contributes to the information
> and work overload of the IETF community as a whole.
>
> The numbers are a reminder to think carefully about what
> you send to the list and to only send what you consider
> to be sufficiently important that the community as
> a whole needs to be aware of it.
>
> Most members of the IETF community  try their best to
> minimize their so called "Narten Number". Many
> regard these postings as a useful service, and I for
> one, thank him for doing it.
>
> - Stewart
>