Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Sat, 15 February 2020 22:48 UTC
Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35D112007A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 14:48:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gixzRuWH-xMP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 14:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 821361200FD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 14:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id n10so13284401wrm.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 14:48:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RaiJYkTyjgFcj/HMXXWY1flq5wwheOgw0Y3Wq0rm+0w=; b=n3psmpMykdtjotliRPNrvb+fXAoSGVrTWAhCJPXGiCC53yEbSmeixqaoBstklfXM/K yHpCSb6jQi0ZyLkc7rHDRVt5I4X61DSuqAgMyy9kmxF3YvgRSSezN8b1VA9hKUWrYsdV WwZatWlpDCymaAWUS/ztnxaCxgPPQ4LxU1Fg+t+ecD04nxkdbmb8cFBqZrro5akIs8J3 LbgSi2bUkrhKeOf2E3fYINg4SMqvm35bkK3cySE+2mp2/lBH1vtb+mOvEKy+q0+L0hAk WqU4VWDHzubmr/GBM2KNFUdM7SC0LvH8IKyJPyt38hHVe+zWg2In9ipQPSypXdKoeUoa ceiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RaiJYkTyjgFcj/HMXXWY1flq5wwheOgw0Y3Wq0rm+0w=; b=CuMY6Pxp8E6u8cB8Wxjj/DDMpxVkbZ0A4n4msRcJHgU4tsgqZZKlOwM0y4ZzZ+IAaU ffztr9HkuPZj4S0bkVnYhMZfSeKPh5b4Iy6L7vAyjAyR53uYeDnQMW9VLtBlyh07QOke 7wwjDvULNZX+RDSMxP/GR59C9W/N7LukTH0AJcTtZfkXHHe1sj25COYi9rUrGzgEhT6e dEoQB9chj/2mw9ykwuEdjWvNgFmE5ltBOXBPsc4BC9+tYv6L5vXXuHw1UTQ9wx/rE/8+ Bu4Ili+HI6aoE7tsRxfNsidCrrQRofYnZ8ymn7YuMYtxun01qove+hNRPvupaaBlMqHK R6MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXFZ6Akm+I0X/8uy5vqnmtIqr3qRD5ZbUFsJ/fWQEUiDPS9TsAa s8KkdarXUHQYHQnSWFpSfz5NFWKCZZBc01zFuxdrOA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxFTXSfmtrou+iOo9bRnEAtnUmaIqd1ynXwk2W1AR1fQ56NxRd56onMYK3cMCJPmgN580XAfmPQ4KwtDH6GcRQ=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:b198:: with SMTP id q24mr12310522wra.188.1581806899847; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 14:48:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOj+MMEMY1gxtj70+5wPOG+XHsk_nX8af4kbXD30_ULDmHMyQg@mail.gmail.com> <666CACAD-F8D4-43A1-8336-3CC9BBCC4B08@puck.nether.net> <5CBB6602066BF4A674D4D092@PSB> <CAOj+MMH_mA0+0maq+oYJZ=_GcGk5BVU9N4v0mG7hs+_f7WUiqw@mail.gmail.com> <d7196dbe-80fd-cea0-be27-e9b4aade22f9@network-heretics.com> <CAOj+MMFjhxOCOrUqzL=pbuRmPFa4-w==7=3rufR+-JX7dq+vPw@mail.gmail.com> <f68a8e6f-1bb6-2edb-86f1-d5f2f867120d@joelhalpern.com> <CAOj+MMEcRTH3=kRQPO2cyPSAxuoaOakRZGL74R6imDQ38WL9ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <e8f247c2-2fd8-5ca5-7016-bb79868fbb8a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e8f247c2-2fd8-5ca5-7016-bb79868fbb8a@gmail.com>
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:48:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJc3aaMMCKdGHN6yWmfGSz_=OHqfyP5iWtei5dkDQz-c1+rBUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e76d8059ea51ea1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PRmBz6Th8o27mo77y3Cg6nal89Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 22:48:24 -0000
Melinda, Your are right, we seem to have come back to how to manage remote participation. I am hoping this discussion does not die off and we do have enough desire to address the challenge once and for all. I agree we need to look at structural changes, but I think this falls into a few categories. I list this in order of importance (based on my opinion). (1). Full Group Support. Having managed remote participation for large groups at the day job, the ability to do this successfully starts with all participants agreeing and being respectful that the meeting will have remote participants. This is the most important part of the equation. If the people in the room are not ready to participate in a manner which allows remote folks to be engaged, than it's likely not going to work out very well. (2). Chairs. As many have noted, how the chairs structure the conversation will have significant impact on how the meeting flows. This includes both the topics in general, and remote participation. (3). Tools. I think having the right tools is important, but many tools can be made to work. I don't have strong opinions here as to which specific tools we use; however, from day-job experience, tools that are simple to use, get the job done are a great start. Complexity does not always beget success here. We may also want to consider that not all participants may have the same level of technical experience as others, so "easy to use" should be top of mind. Having the best technical solution is less important, IMO, than tools everyone can use. regards, Victor K On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 5:26 PM Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems inevitable that any discussion of meeting logistics will > devolve into a discussion of presentations during working group > sessions. At this point I think this pattern goes back several > decades and while there are some working groups that manage meeting > time, and particularly discussion, very well, in general I doubt very > much anything is going to change without structural changes to how we > meet. It would be excellent to see some proposals around that. > > I have been in some sessions where discussion and participation by > remote participants went very well. I don't have a sense of how > well that would scale, but I do think that managing multiple queues > is likely to get messy and may lead to some participants feeling > as if they've been treated unfairly. > > Melinda > > -- > Melinda Shore > melinda.shore@gmail.com > > Software longa, hardware brevis > >
- IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Andrew Alston
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Kathleen Moriarty
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Vittorio Bertola
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Mary B
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Kyle Rose
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jordi Palet Martinez
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Stewart Bryant
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Richard Barnes
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Scott Weeks
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Job Snijders
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Scott Weeks
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Vittorio Bertola
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Ron Bonica
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Bob Hinden
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Michael StJohns
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Andrew Alston
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Andrew Alston
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra Jared Mauch
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra John C Klensin
- IETF WG meetings and remote participation Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Keith Moore
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Keith Moore
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation Christer Holmberg
- Re: IETF WG meetings and remote participation John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Jay Daley
- Another strategic discussion (Re: IETF 107 and Co… Eliot Lear
- RE: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Roni Even (A)
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Livingood, Jason
- Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? Andrew G. Malis