Re: So, where to repeat? (was:Re: management granularity)

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 06 August 2012 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675A221F8600 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.381, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkF4tGG+J-bW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEF821F85FF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3694B8A031 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 14:30:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:30:26 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was:Re: management granularity)
Message-ID: <20120806143025.GB53917@mail.yitter.info>
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF280CE839F@PACDCEXMB06.cable.comcast.com> <501EC24B.4080709@bbiw.net> <20120806120547.GA20379@crankycanuck.ca> <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA234677B967@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9B1@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9B1@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 14:30:29 -0000

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:55:59PM +0000, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
 
> is noise) and the ability to plan ahead to only attend part of the
> week.

That topic imports a completely new one to this discussion: advance
scheduling of the meetings. If there is any principle for repeating a
venue to be found (I'm a sceptic, but let's see), then advance
scheduling can't enter into it because the lack of advance scheduling
is the same at every meeting. So, for the purposes of this discussion,
you have two options: plan well in advance to be there for the entire
week, or plan to buy plane tickets after the agenda is finalized.

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com