Re: WCIT outcome?

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Sat, 29 December 2012 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E46321F84A1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 04:20:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.399
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SB85GZ9f5rXm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 04:20:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FED921F849A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 04:20:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9887 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2012 12:19:33 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 29 Dec 2012 12:19:33 -0000
Message-ID: <50DEDFAF.4050209@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:18:55 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WCIT outcome?
References: <CAMm+Lwh2cHRY+Dk2_SDtZZmUbPcgRpP89u3DHUcniJDrKrX_pw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwh2cHRY+Dk2_SDtZZmUbPcgRpP89u3DHUcniJDrKrX_pw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:20:28 -0000

Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> The stakeholders in the Internet don't even align to countries. My own
> employer is relatively small but was founded in the UK, moved its
> headquarters to the US and has operations in a dozen more countries and
> many times that number of affiliates. The same is even more true of the
> likes of Google, Cisco, Apple, IBM, Microsoft etc.

You miss the most important stakeholders, the end users aligning
to countries.

						Masataka Ohta

PS

Of course, countries acting as representatives for telephone
companies are just as bad as countries acing as representatives
for ISPs.