IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 15 February 2017 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC18129493 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:32:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hc8QjK3Jhat for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DA36129961 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:32:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id t8so91117406vke.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:32:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jPWJTD09pXCdsH/SgGA8dXvJiiYjBAEwcSgwHzGCvp8=; b=CVlUaE2OEhSVu/snfEbmPx7cvKvdWL821uiUrAVEDr0hSeb/ksAJEea4FH7MDNOTi9 lHaEOOBL8ftwxz3DjoNeeuUEAsZetZ14Nusjyqp46PDRueejEIH2D99bIyXU1CcG2VNw lxl9HoTmx/x0wFMTgNpsLQ0I8ur3Ryj2A15Z4F2dDbbgWr9YQsArExxBSXasBZ1bI/kg Cem/SM3NWTpei9I7Lmpfi1MdSWxJ8JDHqLFxuv7hjEl4cMiMLeWPzVrBpM4c//a7jaf2 ewLaT6rTWnfmEhJ3CMi/mqDbkd2L6NeBzAqUJgoZvP6XnHf5HlDc4vbZsQBPTzOzKjIa TIbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jPWJTD09pXCdsH/SgGA8dXvJiiYjBAEwcSgwHzGCvp8=; b=NE//Ql9YFkPRpTXwYF8AUaOxYr3Nav08q5T+qDaEZTFpvpx0YEwL12uoh6z3PEEBZ9 ZETxwoN67VYF+Fob26aySE4UqHkiogYGi6Q6NIUjw6Kh8SdBBjb/4lxVrfc1lnqyfRpl WDPiPe8kbNiY0UWQ0Q5qPp+KmlbvSssdZLlnR0dNiU49Ije+/UJa0+wJ6mDyT/UB7e83 d5rlnW21YRnaen7/wLXRiwOk8MQIfLZKWid9GRXxTJ47L/rh+YE9VVYkUQGIg/+hftBW pgZrSPouxWpkMPsdaBobu/EPInKb5qKscI6IG1uWJSYSjz0owSrH8ICC+fQA9gHbna8E Diog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mTHdXsEi6ui4S5Jo1j+vEaJ4+zO9amp2T3St6xvyfXulLsKDV5BtlW5nxaaBDDmpJ8N3bYiBsCRn+2pTIo
X-Received: by 10.31.142.68 with SMTP id q65mr16503731vkd.83.1487122335512; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:32:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:31:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau2Qv1dww_yxgw_SCx+zmVjXrctkPRoTK9i1x2--zHrxRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <148599306190.18700.14784486605754128729.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAN-Dau0kDiSNXsyq9-xEdS5mzLt-K+MYHqoV8aC8jDVREw8OPQ@mail.gmail.com> <8e5c950a-0957-4323-670f-f3d07f40b4df@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau30OuJ7_57302shrSOs8+sc6iaoDgV27umxb59uwb_pZQ@mail.gmail.com> <E780DEC3-F0E9-4A35-B3EA-8D6961775276@consulintel.es> <CAN-Dau24tGpEvFEjk7xdu9tyN30bYwB6GmVMQjtKHs8LYFAJMQ@mail.gmail.com> <2A163C6E-FFBE-4502-BC2F-0DE8DF88C081@consulintel.es> <CAN-Dau2Qv1dww_yxgw_SCx+zmVjXrctkPRoTK9i1x2--zHrxRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:31:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3Bt34A0uhujKgfBwf9BHw=nNgnm1DR9o80qrNdvWJ9Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143703a8c05c3054887a63f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Pe_A-8YrsMJFaTA8CbgPaZBRV5g>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:32:20 -0000

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:18 AM, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> wrote:

> However, the Interface ID of all unicast addresses is required to be 64
> bit with the exception of the following; addresses for point-to-point links
> [RFC6164], Network-Specific Prefixes used for IPv4/IPv6 Translators
> [RFC6052], and addresses that start with the binary value 000.
>

I don't think it makes sense to cite RFC6052 here, since in RFC 6052
addresses it's not really possible to define the IID in way that makes
sense. See
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/lyZl3I4rXhnmXYFCAQTRWyohfyI .

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email