Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 25 January 2017 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADC3129405 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:48:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v-L1iGpe1aTA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:48:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18100129401 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:48:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id d140so46446874wmd.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:48:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=NkhIGhqV2WfIMW193RKlQ20zbN+ua76Ux+Vbu90uNjo=; b=aUY8MmpQqE4NwAZdmjsxhrjuwJigiqJ3AOAgMLA5lb/BLXBm3bASWlapnb/O/67/o4 WXCLMeIXq2vghnOetC8MNVRZldnAjTAQWoOupRFip3TND5OnebWNF0SF9RsGHRAwLjEk FHy2rTjFN7dUtQy5Mub0S13nr9KrII00VjZIO0UZJasYC7E6cce8V33ibh0H7lRLfN0H MNTOomBVSmX9sBNUkvVcvscJuyFSBylpuMUkOFDSTj0ZY/LsUz2QBPNkYU3KHH2lYR2P pjuCo6JTLVLy8wsoyD+JmIx/zA8lkGaowXS/pKRuQSkU2ahUeNEiWTIOX8SnObkBy+rg vtgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NkhIGhqV2WfIMW193RKlQ20zbN+ua76Ux+Vbu90uNjo=; b=aJdR8Sn00Y6UdyLke12IoVWyDKKoz1gqe2rCa7UJl2OEwO0jLVHY01ZA78/ZltYzj0 80L+ntLo6/mP44NUpKko1c8rJKob6dZRiJGPBv6uvhvB8XygwcKdqW605Gp8CaPYz9m3 n8abq7c8bXIluV8FzjsO1PmttRHPQMzCfUriUKW/9SVQvfWR+w8imJ89DwuxSNP9Aedo HNIE0KbvkLfHhu1GrhuXy0t/Gp1eFAnmxwe/hfTU1dVGhL4N8Osi50e9U7/rL2eemaq+ F4oIwxDl5QuriXihbyvWAVNw61cxvzUi1YAqvCp/JF5FU32cmJN6RorXdcNmqi6J/jCv m3qg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKIEeRkzz1e4WS6TEHnHNO/MrdTFcpFWQQtSRP31jZtHmihAZZBl0tTETMaBMcPGiPL48z5rRQMUqZTGg==
X-Received: by 10.28.169.209 with SMTP id s200mr23882963wme.9.1485388134524; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:48:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.221.6 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:48:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170125204824.6D1BB608EC42@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <844840869.114000858.1485299485194.JavaMail.zimbra@peachymango.org> <20170124235626.042F960836B0@rock.dv.isc.org> <158901d276b3$387d6050$a97820f0$@huitema.net> <CAAiTEH_4WgdmMZQm5nbFbvweibkZ0DAo2feN91zftspD4EbWjg@mail.gmail.com> <20170125204824.6D1BB608EC42@rock.dv.isc.org>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:48:53 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: LYNx64U3RdmHHv2gY756Rh3a_GU
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwg+tC+vGvW3ZizO4bTNbNwiLYDvUtv=esy8sVPO+hL9gg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv4 outage at next IETF in Chicago
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b414e1cabe10546f3e022
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PgB3rZti7nwQjxlVExd8_SKsjdM>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, Franck Martin <franck@peachymango.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:48:57 -0000

What I would much prefer is that we fix the horrible UI problem for WiFi.

Captive portals for logging into WiFi are a 1000% worse suck than NAT. They
don't just change end to end consistency of IP addresses (which I don't
care about), they smash up the TLS trust model which is something we should
care about a very great deal.

Getting people to accept T&C is a logical requirement prior to joining any
network. For IETF, T&C should include Note Well.