IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 10 a.m.

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 11 July 2016 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CDC12D594 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GWorbHWDA1fL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 493A912D589 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f65so68321712wmi.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HGVoYsxJmylrmzx0GkOTPNA7BeuzhGAOe2Q+dvSt7yA=; b=vbVlRm0UTwAq/XymKknea+yxPES51CFYGF87jJGGcGlXRbnNyJ+MqhlAHYUn2mhA4I xPySUTA0EeFVW0iuz9ZXO8RcRMgujkGrfNpC/e5oBb49ewZ2EXoOMNpEkJfrw7vGS2O+ loAsD+ekhSVWSIaMw2J8IDi/O40AlUkuzAK8GV5nfT01kXwfKTHNSQGVEDwHQJtvTKv9 GIQGAcpWXWcbrbCC6WHuEhDeHnJHHdjnuM2DQB1KbJRfqTfI0C9Jb1E3xROBMI1eMP/6 KDkVRwkQ4EvFCm0pf2hdrfSoNacfaFkVHwD3FAgVLbkA3ILEUf0fcBtu7AOMBu6Z92RH mR6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HGVoYsxJmylrmzx0GkOTPNA7BeuzhGAOe2Q+dvSt7yA=; b=Ot0GkrhI5w3mRpecbWa4gK7BBQrSQNpsHusVSbk+1lZ4ZB7rUZmFaKLa1ZuQ9YGcQ/ h3foHnXwiNgrGYmaIHxRtOJttrD/0ACHgHUA630W7+cAObfa+pQ70etppdTEaySsK5E/ YoQ5sfPTKBeMBYdcdSdviHWMLya+Uay4Q8jOxs3tp9DadyfiG7A+tNhnTP87T3ASd1/O EO3iLMoXCoMRzZyzo4KMwvffijwOZ1r3O8ju2QqSxGivsjOhLuAhXXcN1z4arjVxPChO tPuf4KmXRWGtFYnu6g3YpzF7V5ANo/bhX1TfdwVMr89zBDffjWeBR6vl7WxmNPcFX0O+ NEUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKXpD/QL5p7Q/Y7U6sm55G5ydRY9jYJVkF0YbpNYOkLehxl4Zi1awcyXnSnwCYPBQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.186.138 with SMTP id k132mr8369145wmf.65.1468251484230; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kg2sm401205wjb.10.2016.07.11.08.38.03 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: 10 a.m.
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <41f9104e-335f-b2a9-3ca8-9d5b0e7de3b6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:38:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Pi42IKuoRT4qQoo0qV_uolRIFIM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:38:07 -0000

I don't know about relaxing in the evening, although finishing an
hour earlier might help those with jet lag.

I am more concerned that we have wasted five hours of meeting time
that could have been used to reduce meeting conflicts, and thus
enable better cross area review.

Stewart

On 11/07/2016 13:56, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where do I find the discussion and subsequent rough consensus to switch the
> starting time of the IETF f2f meeting days to 10 a.m.?
>
> As far as I'm concerned that is a big mistake, wasting an hour every day
> and making it (even more) difficult to relax in the evenings.
>
> (If there is some local peculiarity in Buenos Aires and Berlin that makes
> this more practical, it would be interesting to know.)
>
> Regards
>     Brian
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email