Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Fri, 17 September 2004 10:22 UTC

Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:15:21 +0200
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20040917121521.63fcf133@chardonnay>
In-Reply-To: <20040917085228.GA1019@danisch.de>
References: <20040911210653.A62C48958A@newdev.harvard.edu> <012c01c49b03$ef7f21b0$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21> <3744.1095366813@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> <20040917082340.GC11438@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <20040917085228.GA1019@danisch.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps)
Precedence: list
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Friday, 17 Sep 2004, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
> AFAIK the US require taking fingerprints even from europeans
> starting at Oct 1. So IETF60 was the last IETF I could attend
> without having my fingerprints taken. I feel everything but
> comfortable with that way to treat people.

I agree.  I sincerely would have wished IETFs from 61 and on
were held outside the US as long as they run their fingerprinting
policy.  I feel really incensed, being treated like that.  And 
I have no illusions about the fingerprints taken when I come to
IETF61 not finding their way into the US fingerprint data bases
which now, I believe, mostly hold fingerprints of criminals and
people who have been arrested and booked.  Bah.

> Currently IETF is held at east- and west-coast. Why not 
> change this into south/north? Canada in Summertime, 
> Mexiko in Wintertime.

Good suggestion.

	Henrik

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

first steps (was The other parts of the report...) scott bradner
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… scott bradner
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Margaret Wasserman
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… John C Klensin
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Steve Crocker
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Carl Malamud
What we need done (Re: first steps (was The other… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… John C Klensin
Re: What we need done (Re: first steps (was The o… avri
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Dave Crocker
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Dave Crocker
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… graham.travers
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… graham.travers
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Steve Crocker
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the repor… Joel Jaeggli
IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Spencer Dawkins
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) shogunx
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Michael Richardson
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Michael Richardson
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Tim Chown
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) william(at)elan.net
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Hadmut Danisch
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Henrik Levkowetz
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Dick St.Peters
Re: IETF 62 Lars Eggert
Re: IETF 62 Sam Hartman
Re: IETF 62 Lars Eggert
Re: IETF 62 John C Klensin
Re: IETF 62 Lars Eggert
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps) Mark Allman
RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62) Robin Uyeshiro
Re: IETF 62 Scott Michel
Re: IETF 62 Michael D Frisch
Re: IETF 62 Ted Faber