Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Michael,

On 2015-01-11 07:37, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Note: it is really impossible at this stage of remote attendance for nomcom
>        to operate with more than 1 remote selecting member.  In effect, all
>        of the interviewers really have got to be at the Third Meeting in
>        person. (And it's not just about technology, it's also about time
>        zones and informal dinners, and all the other things that our
>        technology fails at.)
>        So the person who is always remote, makes a very poor nomcom member.

I made a similar comment.

I guess that remote participation to be eligible to serve on the
NomCom is not that contentious, even though I don't see how we
could establish that the remote participation is at a sufficient
level.

On the hand being remote while serving on the NomCom I do not see
as acceptable; modulo that s-t happens and NomCOm memebers can't
travel. The strong expectation should be that NomCom members should
participate in the IETF meetings during the their NomCom term.

/Loa

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]