Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Mon, 23 April 2012 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1C021F8738 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXThxFKyvCVN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEA721F8741 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dady13 with SMTP id y13so21842117dad.27 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kwwG9f1/e+zHF1zvSqr73U0bhErsT7H9kJ3P30nmh6U=; b=VbgoIL6zx5Rm9vtUBD2l5VT1UQxV8f6SmvbJmyvYG39vEiW4jx0ZVcX9pHjub4iubf NKGqFkDSVy0zRvaM+tLkYzjvN3ikhF/5cY8pxUbzJTRaUwjJC6/4oKxHRY7gVAVXNCUC pPZqhTz1YTguefBD0UwPdSbgTAtxp2PkxUT0oXUobXyY09LCZNx9BCWTgJ1jJGvRYGhs vfuz+1eiE0aAJ0UfXXsUKHbeg+Yif9WA8YNJ4lrpiTDdEGYzRgJnmepl9pFQ9qWe8kMO spRvGYDiUiAq7KARltFd+w6Fv5Jt2YQho1woh8y+i/eFVgCvD5eZNAXssfUVv5T9PbQH 6dGQ==
Received: by 10.68.223.67 with SMTP id qs3mr37789687pbc.142.1335198166129; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from polypro.local (66-230-101-239-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [66.230.101.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm14762911pbr.32.2012.04.23.09.22.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F9581D3.2020605@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:22:43 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
References: <2AC114D8-E97B-47A0-B7E0-9EF016DCB09F@ietf.org> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD465693779173ED21640@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com> <ACDB7FE7-5C75-49C4-904D-8542AC05C66E@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <ACDB7FE7-5C75-49C4-904D-8542AC05C66E@sobco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:22:48 -0000

On 4/23/12 6:58 AM, Scott O Bradner wrote:
> see rfc 2418 - they are to keep a record as who is taking part in a WG's activities
> keeping track of attendees is a basic part of any standards development organization's process

The tension here appears to be between transparency of process and an
individual right to privacy.  I think that the IETF has a considerable
stake in the former, not just because of the frequency with which some
little pisher or other threatens to sue over what they perceive to be
trust/collusion issues, but because openness is an IETF institutional
value.  I think it should continue to be.  I understand the privacy
issues (although I won't necessary lump them as an instance of revealing
PII) but tend to think that the information being revealed is pretty
sparse and the privacy concerns here probably aren't substantial enough
to counterbalance the organizational interest in keeping processes as
open as possible.

Melinda