Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@rozanak.com> Fri, 27 January 2017 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@rozanak.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E01A129857 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:53:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PhARNqiOfCJC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.rozanak.com (mail.rozanak.com [IPv6:2a01:238:42ad:1500:aa19:4238:e48f:61cf]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66176129859 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669EE25CA0CC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:53:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rozanak.com
Received: from mail.rozanak.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.rozanak.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id udjk0Bp7O3oj for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 20:53:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (p200300864F5EE3CFF2DEF1FFFE58C5D4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:86:4f5e:e3cf:f2de:f1ff:fe58:c5d4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5D3925CA0C2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 20:53:02 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com> <20170127194324.GB38766@mx2.yitter.info>
From: Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@rozanak.com>
Message-ID: <5915124b-4f5e-6746-ec0a-23254e1bd3f5@rozanak.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 20:53:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170127194324.GB38766@mx2.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Q-bpgYYjcQcexLQYw_OHQQx6rrc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:53:10 -0000


On 01/27/2017 08:43 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:29:01PM -0500, Dave Burstein wrote:
>> Some might also think that we should move the July 2018 meeting from San
>> Francisco to a location accessible to more of our members, perhaps to
>> Mexico or Canada.
> I note that there is a WG, MTGVENUE, that is working on criteria for
> meeting venues.  It seems to me that discussing the overall question
> of specific exclusions at a venue for individuals on the basis of some
> set of class properties (whether it be nationality, religion, choices
> in emotional relationships, or whatever) would be appropriate in that
> WG.  Moreover, since the WG hasn't finished its work perhaps the WG
> list would be better to explore the issue than the IETF list.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
It appears, it is not just the problem with Muslims, it is also
nationality as well :)
Best,
Hosnieh